From: Jeremy Spilman <jeremy@taplink.co>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bait for reusable addresses
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:58:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9C11B575-1C43-44BB-B5C2-52F892E5A35A@taplink.co> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140124152617.GA31017@petertodd.org>
>
>
>
> I think we need to provide users with better options than that.
>
Perfect privacy without extraordinary computational overhead today means downloading everything. But we could provide better tools to *shift* bandwidth requirements rather than try to reduce them.
I've been thinking about a setup where user runs a UTXO only, and maybe even outbound-connect only (like bitcoinj), full node at home. Then using Tor, mostly for tunneling, they host a hidden service they can connect back to from their smartphone to see balances, manage receive addresses, send funds, etc.
The smartphone is not doing SPV, it's like a web client for the wallet running at home. The initial connection between the smartphone and home wallet has the phone learn two codes, one is the hidden service name, another is an access token which is revocable. You may require further authentication from that point.
With fast bootstrapping / checkpointing of the UTXO I think usability could be as good as SPV, and you would get push-notification of relevant transactions with zero privacy trade-off.
I wonder if people would want to run such an app, if they would run it on their desktop, a dedicated machine, or an old smartphone or other cheap ARM device.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-24 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-16 1:23 [Bitcoin-development] Bait for reusable addresses Gregory Maxwell
2014-01-24 9:02 ` Peter Todd
2014-01-24 12:26 ` Mike Hearn
2014-01-24 15:26 ` Peter Todd
2014-01-24 21:58 ` Jeremy Spilman [this message]
2014-01-24 23:15 ` Mike Hearn
2014-01-24 15:42 ` Adam Back
2014-01-24 16:13 ` Peter Todd
2014-01-25 16:19 ` [Bitcoin-development] (space) efficient reusable addr via weil pairing IBE (Re: Bait for reusable addresses) Adam Back
2014-02-02 2:36 ` Peter Todd
2014-02-02 9:16 ` Jeremy Spilman
2014-02-02 12:26 ` Peter Todd
2014-02-02 15:26 ` Adam Back
2014-02-02 11:55 ` Peter Todd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9C11B575-1C43-44BB-B5C2-52F892E5A35A@taplink.co \
--to=jeremy@taplink.co \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=pete@petertodd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox