public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
To: Alice Wonder <alice@librelamp.com>,
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
	<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alice Wonder via bitcoin-dev
	<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Planned Obsolescence
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:22:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9E1EA42E-B37E-47C9-89B0-37F4CDB2B711@mattcorallo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2e0dd76-e6ec-8ccb-5a33-48f0d005afe9@librelamp.com>

Please do report bugs to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin . If you never report them of course they won't get fixed. I'm not aware of test suite failures and know a bunch of folks who use CentOS, though not sure how many develop on it.

On December 18, 2016 12:07:36 PM PST, Alice Wonder via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>On 12/14/2016 07:38 PM, Juan Garavaglia via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
>>
>> For reasons I am unable to determine a significant number of node
>> operators do not upgrade their clients.
>
>I almost did not update to 0.13.0 because the test suite was failing
>due 
>to python errors. How to fix them was posted on bitcointalk.
>
>0.13.1 came with new python errors in the test suite. So I just said 
>fuck it.
>
>When the test suite actually works in my fairly standard environment 
>(CentOS) in the distributed release, I will upgrade.
>
>Until then, I'm not jumping through hoops to make the test suite work 
>and I'm not running clients that haven't passed the test suite so
>that's 
>why I almost didn't update to 0.13.0 and haven't updated since.
>_______________________________________________
>bitcoin-dev mailing list
>bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev



  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-19  2:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <f27bd300c20d1b48cddc7e1d1dc1a96c@112bit.com>
2016-12-15  3:38 ` [bitcoin-dev] Planned Obsolescence jg
2016-12-15 18:12   ` Aymeric Vitte
2016-12-15 18:48   ` Jorge Timón
2016-12-15 22:25     ` Angel Leon
2016-12-15 22:44     ` Ethan Heilman
2016-12-18 10:34       ` Matt Corallo
2016-12-18 20:50         ` Chris Riley
2016-12-18 20:07   ` Alice Wonder
2016-12-18 20:51     ` [bitcoin-dev] Python test suite failures (was Re: Planned Obsolescence) Douglas Roark
2016-12-19  8:13       ` Alice Wonder
2016-12-21 18:33         ` Marco Falke
2016-12-19  2:22     ` Matt Corallo [this message]
2016-12-19  6:39       ` [bitcoin-dev] Planned Obsolescence Btc Drak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9E1EA42E-B37E-47C9-89B0-37F4CDB2B711@mattcorallo.com \
    --to=lf-lists@mattcorallo.com \
    --cc=alice@librelamp.com \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox