From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76B9A1BB for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:26:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:16:02 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.132.66]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C218F171 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [81.0.112.130] (helo=[192.168.0.106]); authenticated by wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1Zyg1a-00032H-GE; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:10:18 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Tamas Blummer In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:10:17 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9F747105-0BE5-48B0-9032-A0B4CBFC8A66@bitsofproof.com> References: To: Eric Lombrozo , Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; tamas@bitsofproof.com; 1447766782; 51c51250; X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:53:21 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamic Hierarchical Deterministic Key Trees X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:26:23 -0000 Hi Eric, Would you please enumerate, or point to, arguments that discourage the = use of a key both for signing and for derivation of a deeper level of = the hierarchy ? Tamas Blummer > On Nov 17, 2015, at 12:40, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev = wrote: >=20 > I've submitted a BIP proposal that solves the issue of needing to = predefine HD wallet structures and not being able to arbitrarily nest = deeper levels. Comments appreciated. > =20 > https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/242 > =20 > =20 > - Eric > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev