From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB52A1120 for ; Tue, 1 May 2018 05:08:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-1857040132.protonmail.ch (mail-1857040132.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.132]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61998712 for ; Tue, 1 May 2018 05:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 01:07:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=default; t=1525151278; bh=YL8gzUmZl9QC+5TJLodzSCpqaW4IxX+IB0dUkd+nviw=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From; b=o/A76VsAUkQSGx5PxSTra6vHZuzaLI91xSISGPrmQxFDgxNRzqfaJiGArLlPPUoxA ARYM+vTF9SSLEeoXRce29xNUVubT20V7f64oGr6dkEqmVA4YIBx9Y+gyYSR2jvQZAm H5Wm9/yWyT+cj+A6dumIwXWgBo03A6cZBMhQDhYM= To: Christian Decker From: ZmnSCPxj Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj Message-ID: <9OOOx7l1TdSQBlgt0MuRvtKzuxa_Z3g0kF315Legl5L-UOvvNZFL_tgAuWhe015Q-ZtOdYfI9iGJkAqhfb42RqazYq0JvTCzXaEr1XkD_iY=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <874ljsitvx.fsf@gmail.com> References: <874ljsitvx.fsf@gmail.com> Feedback-ID: el4j0RWPRERue64lIQeq9Y2FP-mdB86tFqjmrJyEPR9VAtMovPEo9tvgA0CrTsSHJeeyPXqnoAu6DN-R04uJUg==:Ext:ProtonMail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 01 May 2018 11:06:04 +0000 Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] eltoo: A Simplified update Mechanism for Lightning and Off-Chain Contracts X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 05:08:01 -0000 Good morning Christian, This is very interesting indeed! I have started skimming through the paper. I am uncertain if the below text is correct? > Throughout this paper we will use the terms *input script* to refer to `w= itnessProgram` and `scriptPubKey`, and *output script* to refer to the `wit= ness` or `scriptSig`. Figure 2 contains to what looks to me like a `witnessProgram`, `scriptPubKe= y`, or `redeemScript` but refers to it as an "output script": > OP_IF > 10 OP_CSV > 2 As Bs 2 OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY > OP_ELSE > 2 Au Bu 2 OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY > OP_ENDIF > > Figure 2: The output script used by the on-chain update transactions. Regards, ZmnSCPxj