messages from 2015-05-30 00:00:36 to 2015-06-10 19:12:10 UTC [more...]
[Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list?
2015-06-10 19:12 UTC (11+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism
2015-06-10 17:37 UTC
[Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee
2015-06-10 9:10 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee patch against Bitcoin Core v0.10.2
[Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers
2015-06-10 2:40 UTC (11+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs
2015-06-09 20:14 UTC (8+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] Block Size Experiment Underway
2015-06-09 19:03 UTC (21+ messages)
` [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit
` [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the blocksize limit
[Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions
2015-06-08 21:36 UTC (7+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate
2015-06-08 0:55 UTC (11+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment
2015-06-06 22:01 UTC (13+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] BIP for PoP URI scheme
2015-06-06 14:35 UTC
[Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin core 0.11.0 release candidate 1 available
2015-06-05 8:59 UTC
[Bitcoin-development] Tough questions for Peter Todd, Chief Scientist {Mastercoin | Counterparty | Coinkite | Darkwallet | Viacoin}
2015-06-04 22:47 UTC (9+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal
2015-06-03 20:42 UTC (8+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 49, Issue 16
2015-06-03 5:50 UTC
[Bitcoin-development] Max Block Size: Simple Voting Procedure
2015-06-03 4:18 UTC (7+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step
2015-06-02 16:18 UTC (8+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement signalled via sequence numbers
2015-06-02 15:44 UTC (9+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] DevCore London
2015-06-02 14:20 UTC (2+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements
2015-06-02 11:43 UTC (3+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks)
2015-06-02 0:42 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extensionblocks)
[Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements
2015-06-01 22:13 UTC (2+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] Why do we need a MAX_BLOCK_SIZE at all?
2015-06-01 20:18 UTC (4+ messages)
` [Bitcoin-development] We are filling most blocks right now - Let's change the max blocksize default
[Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase Requirements
2015-06-01 20:15 UTC (55+ messages)
` [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: "
` [Bitcoin-development] [Bulk] "
[Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements
2015-06-01 19:23 UTC (5+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extensionblocks)
2015-06-01 19:02 UTC
[Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step function
2015-06-01 11:46 UTC (16+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements
2015-06-01 11:12 UTC
[Bitcoin-development] Proposal: A measured response to save Bitcoin Core
2015-05-31 10:01 UTC (4+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase Requirements
2015-05-31 0:32 UTC (2+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks) Re: Proposed alternatives to the 20MB stepfunction
2015-05-30 3:27 UTC (2+ messages)
[Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks) Re: Proposed alternatives to the 20MB stepfunction
2015-05-30 0:16 UTC (2+ messages)
page: next (older) | prev (newer) | latest
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox