messages from 2015-07-30 06:28:23 to 2015-08-05 22:44:24 UTC [more...]
[bitcoin-dev] Eli Dourado on "governance"
2015-08-05 22:44 UTC (25+ messages)
` [bitcoin-dev] "A Transaction Fee Market Exists Without a Block Size Limit"--new research paper suggests
[bitcoin-dev] Idea: Efficient bitcoin block propagation
2015-08-05 22:14 UTC (6+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Consensus fork activation thresholds: Block.nTime vs median time vs block.nHeight
2015-08-05 19:29 UTC (5+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Block size following technological growth
2015-08-05 8:14 UTC (48+ messages)
` [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: "
[bitcoin-dev] BIP65 / CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY deployment
2015-08-04 16:54 UTC (3+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] A reason we can all agree on to increase block size
2015-08-04 10:53 UTC (19+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Wrapping up the block size debate with voting
2015-08-04 10:22 UTC (7+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Incentivising full nodes by having SPV nodes to pay for data requests
2015-08-03 17:54 UTC (4+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] BIP draft: Hardfork bit
2015-08-03 8:54 UTC (7+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] A compromise between BIP101 and Pieter's proposal
2015-08-02 22:07 UTC (14+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't temporary
2015-08-01 21:05 UTC (51+ messages)
` [bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn'ttemporary
[bitcoin-dev] Block size hard fork
2015-08-01 8:43 UTC (3+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't temporary
2015-07-31 23:05 UTC
[Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Motivation and deployment of consensus rules changes ([soft/hard]forks)
2015-07-31 20:37 UTC (7+ messages)
` [bitcoin-dev] "
[bitcoin-dev] Proposal: extend bip70 with OpenAlias
2015-07-31 20:34 UTC (7+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Răspuns: Personal opinion on the fee market from a worried local trader
2015-07-31 15:24 UTC (19+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Răspuns: Personal opinion on the fee market from a worried local trader
2015-07-31 14:29 UTC (2+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't temporary
2015-07-31 3:18 UTC (2+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] A summary of block size hardfork proposals
2015-07-31 3:10 UTC (3+ messages)
` [bitcoin-dev] A summary of block size hardfork proposals (and a softforking one)
` [bitcoin-dev] CORRECTIONS: A summary of block size hardfork proposals
[bitcoin-dev] Another block size limit solution - dynamic block size limit
2015-07-31 2:02 UTC (2+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] LockUnspent not working, bug?
2015-07-30 23:00 UTC (2+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Data / Evidence regd "penalties" for not validating blocks (Was: Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't temporary)
2015-07-30 6:28 UTC
page: next (older) | prev (newer) | latest
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox