public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
 messages from 2015-12-18 10:13:55 to 2016-01-08 18:53:01 UTC [more...]

[bitcoin-dev] Time to worry about 80-bit collision attacks or not?
 2016-01-08 18:52 UTC  (27+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] SegWit testnet is live
 2016-01-08 15:35 UTC  (4+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] New BIP editor, and request for information
 2016-01-07 17:10 UTC 

[bitcoin-dev] Confidential Transactions as a soft fork (using segwit)
 2016-01-06 15:18 UTC 

[bitcoin-dev] Segregated Witness BIPs
 2016-01-05  5:43 UTC  (4+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] An implementation of BIP102 as a softfork
 2016-01-05  1:26 UTC  (11+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork
 2016-01-04 21:53 UTC  (15+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] [BIP Draft] Decentralized Improvement Proposals
 2016-01-03 23:31 UTC  (5+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] Segregated witnesses and validationless mining
 2016-01-02 16:54 UTC  (4+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] BIP numbers
 2015-12-31 23:30 UTC  (3+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] How to preserve the value of coins after a fork
 2015-12-30 23:13 UTC  (5+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] fork types (Re: An implementation of BIP102 as a softfork.)
 2015-12-30 23:10 UTC  (2+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] Generalized soft forks
 2015-12-30 17:58 UTC 

[bitcoin-dev] An implementation of BIP102 as a softfork
 2015-12-30 14:28 UTC  (2+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] We need to fix the block withholding attack
 2015-12-29 21:51 UTC  (47+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] We can trivially fix quadratic CHECKSIG with a simple soft-fork modifying just SignatureHash()
 2015-12-29 13:00 UTC  (5+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] Consensus census
 2015-12-28  0:10 UTC 

[bitcoin-dev] Block size: It's economics & user preparation & moral hazard
 2015-12-27  0:33 UTC  (19+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] "Hashpower liquidity" is more important than "mining centralization"
 2015-12-26  3:18 UTC 

[bitcoin-dev] Weekly developer meetings over holidays
 2015-12-22 15:58 UTC 

[bitcoin-dev] A new payment address format for segregated witness or not?
 2015-12-21 15:48 UTC  (2+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] Capacity increases for the Bitcoin system
 2015-12-21  9:56 UTC  (10+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork
 2015-12-21  3:58 UTC  (3+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] Forget dormant UTXOs without confiscating bitcoin
 2015-12-21  3:34 UTC  (11+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] On the security of softforks
 2015-12-20 19:16 UTC  (9+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] Segregated witness softfork with moderate adoption has very small block size effect
 2015-12-20  3:37 UTC  (7+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] Segregated Witness in the context of Scaling Bitcoin
 2015-12-19 23:03 UTC  (10+ messages)

[bitcoin-dev] The increase of max block size should be determined by block height instead of block time
 2015-12-19 18:20 UTC  (10+ messages)


This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox