public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>
To: Ryan Butler <rryananizer@gmail.com>
Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
	<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Răspuns: Personal opinion on the fee market from a worried local trader
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 21:07:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <A03FDB78-074B-4334-B56A-71593F4D7985@me.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF_2MyVAXg9788gatEQ-t4=8rJxXdkf9DA45uF5_gksDUM6b=A@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 825 bytes --]



> On Jul 29, 2015, at 8:41 PM, Ryan Butler via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> Does an unlimited blocksize imply the lack of a fee market?  Isn't every miner able to set their minimum accepted fee or transaction acceptance algorithm?
> 

Yes, miners can set this, and giving them more fine grained control over this (with sane defaults) will have a far bigger impact on establishing a proper fee market than depending on capacity (that nobody has any control over). 

Allowing miners to set up some sort of tiered offering that delays transactions and maybe even have their tiers tie into the exchange rate to keep the costs constant over time.

I'm sure something like this has probably already been discussed before and I'm curious what the objections are to such a thing?

jp

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1179 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-30  4:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CADZB0_ZgDMhVgCUh2PTAPDL7k_W8QGt_HLYdkwv_qQ5xEMn8HA@mail.gmail.com>
2015-07-29 14:09 ` [bitcoin-dev] Răspuns: Personal opinion on the fee market from a worried local trader Vali Zero
2015-07-29 17:47   ` Raystonn .
2015-07-29 22:54     ` s7r
2015-07-30  3:41       ` Ryan Butler
2015-07-30  4:00         ` Adam Back
2015-07-30  4:05           ` Adam Back
2015-07-30  4:48           ` Ryan Butler
2015-07-30 13:14             ` Tom Harding
2015-07-30 14:25               ` Dave Hudson
2015-07-30 14:57                 ` Tom Harding
2015-07-30 18:14               ` Jorge Timón
2015-07-30 18:16                 ` Jorge Timón
2015-07-30 20:53                 ` Tom Harding
2015-07-31  1:21                   ` Jorge Timón
2015-07-31  1:29                     ` Jorge Timón
2015-07-31  9:56                     ` Thomas Zander
2015-07-31 12:32                       ` Oleg Andreev
2015-07-31 15:24                         ` Jorge Timón
2015-07-30 12:45           ` Ivan Brightly
2015-07-30  4:07         ` Jean-Paul Kogelman [this message]
2015-07-30  9:52       ` odinn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=A03FDB78-074B-4334-B56A-71593F4D7985@me.com \
    --to=jeanpaulkogelman@me.com \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=rryananizer@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox