From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40273C21
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 13 May 2019 23:40:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-40135.protonmail.ch (mail-40135.protonmail.ch
	[185.70.40.135])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E5FD837
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 13 May 2019 23:39:59 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 23:39:51 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
	s=default; t=1557790797;
	bh=/sx13yP8ztNHYrvtvvEctPxAxKxLQye9NWZJ6+Yc56Y=;
	h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Feedback-ID:
	From;
	b=tiXb4yUkvGrtBI0G71n56ir8R94HnYP/hkDJZLqyi5WCL9/O+ritpALlx0AJhcjKs
	I1uMSiArSkOuYWKWgqC1FRUZ2qwyXCWH9fn+V0f7T+++25KfIO2ccjCF5lwHTZSbDi
	y6zEtQuzIPOeIsZGIiBIst8PziVDBUzLHT732Qmo=
To: Christopher DeLucia <deluciac@bu.edu>,
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <AuLZSDpWg-6A75Z1awd0jVhhlGyUvjARCUoXMYbL7Nlfy1E-aC7GD2RLrGcaXk33gd6mHA_tdEonPcQCdXxgHnPU7-J2SMp7OGGd_1eE8-M=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPwAn9RLT7_FpQ4PMrN9OpoPw2y0qZDiGzMYp_fMq+A8sO55GQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPwAn9RLT7_FpQ4PMrN9OpoPw2y0qZDiGzMYp_fMq+A8sO55GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Feedback-ID: el4j0RWPRERue64lIQeq9Y2FP-mdB86tFqjmrJyEPR9VAtMovPEo9tvgA0CrTsSHJeeyPXqnoAu6DN-R04uJUg==:Ext:ProtonMail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 17 May 2019 08:32:10 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] IBLT & Bitcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 23:40:00 -0000

Good morning Chris,

As I understand it, the latest proposal for improved transaction relay is t=
o use Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem codes for set reconciliation.
https://github.com/sipa/minisketch

Regards,
ZmnSCPxj


Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me=
ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90
On Sunday, May 12, 2019 9:35 AM, Christopher DeLucia via bitcoin-dev <bitco=
in-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> While in college (2017), I produced this paper on IBLT applications and B=
itcoin that referenced some of the research done by folks like Gavin Andres=
en and Rusty Russell.=C2=A0
>
> This should come with a disclaimer: I have not really looked at this pape=
r nor Bitcoin since 2017.=C2=A0 Additionally, this paper was not peer revie=
wed; it was just for class.
>
> Regardless, I came across it when I was cleaning out some old docs on my =
drive and figured I'd send it over to bitcoin-dev in the event it can contr=
ibute to anything at all.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris