From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XmeaL-0003hl-V6 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 08:07:58 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.66]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1XmeaK-0001pR-2J for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 08:07:57 +0000 Received: from [37.143.74.116] (helo=[192.168.0.100]); authenticated by wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1XmeaD-0003Js-0g; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:07:49 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FBF84D8B-8972-4CA0-A9A0-709E5ECFD39F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Tamas Blummer In-Reply-To: <20141107000310.GA6532@savin.petertodd.org> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:07:47 +0100 Message-Id: References: <20141106213215.GA12918@savin.petertodd.org> <545BF0C2.3030201@bluematt.me> <545BFAD6.1000504@riseup.net> <20141106232649.GD26859@savin.petertodd.org> <545C0617.7020300@riseup.net> <20141107000310.GA6532@savin.petertodd.org> To: Peter Todd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; tamas@bitsofproof.com; 1415347676; 0ed13101; X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.237.132.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Headers-End: 1XmeaK-0001pR-2J Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net, Justus Ranvier Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] The difficulty of writing consensus critical code: the SIGHASH_SINGLE bug X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 08:07:58 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_FBF84D8B-8972-4CA0-A9A0-709E5ECFD39F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Peter, forking would work best with a freeze of the consensus code. Do you see = any chance for that? Tamas Blummer On Nov 7, 2014, at 1:03 AM, Peter Todd wrote: > Forking the codebase, rather than rewriting it, best > ensures that your code actually implements the protocol properly, is > safe to use for mining, and actually gets used. >=20 > Rewriting Bitcoin Core is a fun project, but it's terrible politics. --Apple-Mail=_FBF84D8B-8972-4CA0-A9A0-709E5ECFD39F Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUXH3TAAoJEPZykcUXcTkce6EH/ibwFUTyJLOCzgBg3dD9cWQF 9d3GXOVLI9XfPSoS9p+6TqidYnt6g2/9nshNzo3dyQvBbj3cwbcxVyv5aCLy9p1I Q5hHmgA75IZrbPh3uMlp8Gw21c3yjr7jFA0q8a1gPij9Ucc4qEdRnN+XLq91BUto xNL2mv16S9WT+aaCBvH5v3gONu1eqhvCCg33lnwX7cBUdWJrCgRpj11E5+dZ1q6B aYIFnhYrmAGMQ00qDgDpOJyr/UOHmNVnQ6gQVPmN/x/Kxuo/Xr3a2EWfFyDDziSj GLiiCZd24IvcOOLFIXrzktnRXD+NV39U9YMKtmtwRIsJTQaaWdqr9QZ8SBVX5IY= =45IE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_FBF84D8B-8972-4CA0-A9A0-709E5ECFD39F--