On Jul 23, 2015, at 9:28 AM, Gavin Andresen via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:I'd really like to move from "IMPOSSIBLE because... (electrum hasn't been optimized(by the way: you should run on SSDs, LevelDB isn't designed for spinning disks),what if the network is attacked? (attacked HOW???), current p2p network is usingthe simplest, stupidest possible block propagation algorithm...)"... to "lets work together and work through the problems and scale it up."
On Jul 23, 2015, at 9:50 AM, cipher anthem via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:Why not help on a project that actually seems to offer great scalability like the lightning network? There have been great progress there.
On Jul 23, 2015, at 5:17 AM, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:But it seems to me that the "not now side" has no centralization
concerns at all and their true position is "not ever hit the blocksize
limit", that's the only explanation I can find to their lack of
answers to the "when do you think we should allow users to notice that
there's a limit in the blocksize to guarantee that the system can be
decentralized?".