Decision making is not the goal of this site, it is only a way to see various pros and cons of various devs on various proposals in a single place.

This is for the community to have a coherent view about what you are talking about now spread into reddit/mailing/forums.

If you did not analyzed a proposal yet, you don't have to fill out your opinion veto or approval.

It is only to show what you would you "approve" and what you would "veto", after your analysis.

Then point out all the discussions in the opinion section that lead you to your conclusion.

You can change edit your position as you progress into your analysis and as new BIP get redacted.

I'm eager to include the new proposals.

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I created a small website which show a chart of your approvals about various
> BIPs (which you must fill by yourself with a signed pgp message)
> For each BIP, you can fill if you approve or not, and give comments. (HTML
> accepted, so you can link stuff you your posts)
> It would help the community a lot, so I hope you will do it !
> I'm open to add other important devs, big miners, or other proposal that I
> missed.

I think this is a bit well, sad, at the moment-- a basic principle in
sound decision making is that one should try to withhold judgement
until after the analysis and options are laid out to avoid prematurely
laying down "battle lines" which then they're socially and politically
committed to a particular answer.

There are several other BIPs in the works right now that aren't out
there yet, as well (as presumably) new insight from the workshop. It
would be a shame if these things would be for naught because of being
decided prematurely.