public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] On Hardforks in the Context of SegWit
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 21:32:06 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+1nnrnghvJFfcg0Az0di1EGJYrSh-9h+5Y9P1pfQbbL-AuX=w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 693 bytes --]

> 2) In order to prevent significant blowups in the cost to validate
> [...] and transactions are only allowed to contain
> up to 20 non-segwit inputs. [...]

There is two kind of hard fork, the one who breaks things, and the one who
does not.
Restricting the non-segwit inputs would disrupt lots of services, and
potentially invalidating
hash time locked transactions, which is a very bad precedent.
So I'm strongly against this particular point.

> scriptPubKeys are now limited to 100 bytes in
> size and may not contain OP_CODESEPARATOR, scriptSigs must be push-only
> (ie no non-push opcodes)

Same problem for native multisig, however potentially less important than
the previous point.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1094 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2016-02-09 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-09 12:32 Nicolas Dorier [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-02-08 19:26 [bitcoin-dev] On Hardforks in the Context of SegWit Matt Corallo
2016-02-08 20:37 ` jl2012
2016-02-08 22:24   ` Tao Effect
     [not found]     ` <CAAcC9yuJY3Lsd7Z0rx8TFLNT1fJLhrpxzKJREQ7FmdNNjdXJow@mail.gmail.com>
2016-02-09  2:45       ` Tao Effect
2016-02-08 22:36 ` Simon Liu
2016-02-08 22:54   ` Peter Todd
2016-02-09  9:00 ` Anthony Towns
2016-02-09 21:54   ` Matt Corallo
2016-02-09 22:00     ` Matt Corallo
2016-02-09 22:10       ` Luke Dashjr
2016-02-09 22:39         ` Matt Corallo
2016-02-10  5:16       ` Anthony Towns

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+1nnrnghvJFfcg0Az0di1EGJYrSh-9h+5Y9P1pfQbbL-AuX=w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=nicolas.dorier@gmail.com \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox