From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UaE0k-0002Rc-Uc for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 08 May 2013 23:43:03 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1UaE0j-0004BP-LM for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 08 May 2013 23:43:02 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id bg2so1682706pad.25 for ; Wed, 08 May 2013 16:42:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=X322p14t8C7Ppp4LLCKQF11AcnGiF6oiLq4+ARQzmUA=; b=KejHvkP8WYMBV1C3NsnTYm2cm2prjY0CVxEu+1NDAYTx4UE4jFBy+x+pDHoeZE12oh sFXBgd70xHvFPK4ig04LCev/LX3A6sy8uOk7qfnJBbM9Ozu35qGiNridgcjBceabvnSf mv2mKTNrVthSBxaBERpjKTetOu2G4Jwk2kdikAELDslcx6FzHegivHMGmvq6qs1IcPtd V6XK+1CKVihIRVe785c9N10oLJOJdv66jUByh5p+m0bxw/s67ip5tri91wo2AzVucPIm HA+Soo7m9DKr4VNxq3xHKHg3pdq60necatisna68kkYdi9ATOlegDE5UQH9J9tHOM+Dq Ak1g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.164.232 with SMTP id yt8mr10477821pab.21.1368056575762; Wed, 08 May 2013 16:42:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.240.106 with HTTP; Wed, 8 May 2013 16:42:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [99.43.178.25] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 19:42:55 -0400 Message-ID: From: Jeff Garzik To: Addy Yeow Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk7ACqynd4N/IxcdukkvrpMblIuaui2VRktabK13PYhY9BffG2aTnfyeMfLWFMnekf0DN/4 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1UaE0j-0004BP-LM Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 32 vs 64-bit timestamp fields X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 23:43:03 -0000 On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Addy Yeow wrote: > Hi list, > > Can someone explain why do we have 32-bit and 64-bit timestamp fields > instead of all being 64-bit? > > https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_specification Hysterical raisins. -- Jeff Garzik exMULTI, Inc. jgarzik@exmulti.com