From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
To: Peter Vessenes <peter@coinlab.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 34: Block v2, Height in Coinbase
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 12:49:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+8xBpdbgkzwOvyUsJYEXNMTBwuvAbFsKx2xF1s0BMPiL9n1Qw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMGNxUsZQMN+M4cR8nMhNmJAAnT2ZSPjrMHV0BetdiMmj453sA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Peter Vessenes <peter@coinlab.com> wrote:
> The proposal is simple, and it's a small change for miners, I imagine.
>
> My question is: why?
>
> I worry about stuffing too many requirements on the coinbase. I suppose
> the coinbase is easily extendible if we run out of bytes, but I think I'd
> like to see some more discussion / good / bad type cases for making this
> change. What do we get over just the prev_hash by doing this?
With the existing setup (sans height in coinbase), you might not have
unique transactions, with all that entails.
> Anyway, some background would be great; if I missed it, I'm happy to go
> read up, but I didn't see any links on the wiki.
Gavin wrote some notes on upgrades and BIP16 lessons-learned at
https://gist.github.com/2355445
--
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgarzik@exmulti.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-06 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-06 15:10 [Bitcoin-development] BIP 34: Block v2, Height in Coinbase Jeff Garzik
2012-07-06 16:45 ` Peter Vessenes
2012-07-06 16:49 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2012-07-06 16:56 ` Mark Friedenbach
2012-07-06 20:02 ` Gavin Andresen
2012-07-06 20:10 ` Gregory Maxwell
2012-07-06 20:02 ` Amir Taaki
2012-07-06 17:02 ` Peter Vessenes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+8xBpdbgkzwOvyUsJYEXNMTBwuvAbFsKx2xF1s0BMPiL9n1Qw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jgarzik@exmulti.com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=peter@coinlab.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox