From: Blockchain Group <shekharhiran@gmail.com>
To: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Building a Bitcoin API and query system.
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 21:36:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+9w0-73LzutZaFEQVnb=f_vSh8K8QfULh8Qc6j3x9JpnNBZHg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <758E3CA7-295B-4B77-BFF5-9AAE959D53EA@voskuil.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3145 bytes --]
Thanks! That is what my main point is.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, 8:10 PM Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org> wrote:
> The API implementation is not what is centralizing, nor is full indexation
> non-scalable. The centralization is in not running the API from a node
> under your own control. This is of course implied by the comment, “without
> the need for syncing”. In other words it is the deployment cost of the node
> that is centralizing.
>
> Yet if people relied only on bitcoind and never centralized services there
> would be *no* block explorers (and no secure light wallets), because it
> does not provide remote query and does not fully index.
>
> Block explorers and light wallets are pretty useful, so presumably some
> API must provide these features (ideally with reduced deployment cost).
> That will either be centralized or decentralized services. As such it seems
> wise to encourage the latter, as opposed to questioning whether there is
> any valid block explorer use case.
>
> e
>
>
> > On Aug 28, 2018, at 11:36, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > To give a critical viewpoint on a such API:
> >
> > Such APIs usually result in central validation, meaning that users trust
> API services rather the validating their own data. It break some of the
> fundamental properties of Bitcoin (avoid trusted third parties).
> > Systems or applications depending on a full indexed blockchain (a thus
> such API) do usually scale pretty bad.
> >
> > I’d like to hear some concrete use-cases for a such block explorer(ish)
> API.
> >
> > Thanks
> > —
> > Jonas
> >
> >> Am 26.08.2018 um 21:58 schrieb Blockchain Group via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>:
> >>
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> I am C++ & Node.js developer. I want to propose making a new Bitcoin
> API that supports fast quering of Bitcoin blocks and transactions without
> the need for syncing with all previous nodes.
> >>
> >> In a typical case where I want to build a full fleged Bitcoin explorer
> cum wallet system on my end with external APIs, I need to sync my node and
> then query for the information I need to show separately. I am proposing a
> unified method of finding/quering the blockchain data with a standardized
> template containing minimal information about the actual mined block or
> transaction yet satify the need of what I want to query.
> >>
> >> I am working on making a template and a support mechanism on Node.js. I
> want to propose it as an improvement (BIP). It will be a great help to
> future web developers who want to make something similar.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Sumit Lahiri.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> >> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bitcoin-dev mailing list
> > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4191 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-26 19:58 [bitcoin-dev] Building a Bitcoin API and query system Blockchain Group
2018-08-28 15:15 ` Joseph Gleason ⑈
2018-08-28 15:47 ` Matias Alejo Garcia
2018-08-28 17:34 ` Blockchain Group
2018-08-28 17:51 ` Guido Dassori
2018-08-28 18:14 ` Eric Voskuil
2018-08-28 18:36 ` Jonas Schnelli
2018-08-29 12:25 ` Blockchain Group
2018-08-29 14:40 ` Eric Voskuil
2018-08-29 16:06 ` Blockchain Group [this message]
2018-08-29 18:27 ` Jonas Schnelli
2018-08-29 18:29 ` Blockchain Group
2018-08-29 18:45 ` Eric Voskuil
2018-08-30 10:03 ` Aymeric Vitte
2018-08-30 11:40 ` Blockchain Group
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+9w0-73LzutZaFEQVnb=f_vSh8K8QfULh8Qc6j3x9JpnNBZHg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=shekharhiran@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=eric@voskuil.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox