From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AB3E826 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:11:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (mail-ig0-f178.google.com [209.85.213.178]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C50C10E for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igui7 with SMTP id i7so740094igu.0 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+vlV9nyY7aFQQoE68tnApVfXw7yZody72wUOvth/k68=; b=HcT0xaol32dK8T0QNhR3SPVn2Irfc/+zXxLdFj/lZJH0cmIqJJZMaLBLLhxFyZ2oo1 KTpheuev6R6+oK1ZTAV9PkOi1T9oYeCHplGxR4DTUXNukwXNLe3iHVdptT7lZucwYsEW 958VCEPKecLXZKoW+sWf4G6lKqYDtYOQqxzA8F2yUGnMMslaTEoe7gaWRDQAVeSyGXla N00S/tMOzGS3JiaPhsQGPjfosOGRCck+vPCwYG2WkttkMCvXkZUVkWUPT01tWXSFrMPX B2p1ok++Jwj6fAKBY83A250/a4PQiCc9/K/588ZBY+N4wHTDQMLRInM6IilWMkuo6gPh wKVw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.30.36 with SMTP id p4mr75908igh.87.1440105060489; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.79.97.135 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55CB2C57.1070307@mail.bihthai.net> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:11:00 -0700 Message-ID: From: Elliot Olds To: Bitcoin Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd7526291dfae051dc49671 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A summary list of all concerns related to not rising the block size X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:11:01 -0000 --047d7bd7526291dfae051dc49671 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of arguments on > "each side" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective. > [...] > Here's the updated both-thread lists: > > > http://0bin.net/paste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-Gnj= R5NZMZgFb I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my personal notes into a site attempting to list all the strongest arguments and counterarguments on the block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed. Here's the site: https://sites.google.com/site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/ Feedback welcome. --047d7bd7526291dfae051dc49671 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On F= ri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <bitcoin= -dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of argument= s on
"each side" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective.[...]
Here's the updated both-thread lists:

http://0bin.net/pa= ste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-GnjR5NZMZgFb

I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my pe= rsonal notes into a site attempting to list all the strongest arguments and= counterarguments on the block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed= .=C2=A0


Feedback welcome.= =C2=A0
=C2=A0
--047d7bd7526291dfae051dc49671--