From: Bram Cohen <bram@bittorrent.com>
To: praxeology_guy <praxeology_guy@protonmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Guessing the spentness status of the pruned relatives
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 19:18:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+KqGkpLJasuYqn9tzA_CUihwmoRqpQZ_exOUT_uqGYEesvceQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8f4fSx74VGLlhmwWm7Gwzl5qNMd6okkHcBlCT55CRkYxa_lrEHL-C0hARMXcTaf4CNVIh8no1CHJF-_bmZJRJDsx1H10PCrI45X0D7QdukE=@protonmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1018 bytes --]
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 6:58 PM, praxeology_guy <
praxeology_guy@protonmail.com> wrote:
> Bram Cohen,
>
> In R&D: First its appropriate to explore all interesting ideas, and help
> each other improve their ideas. Last, when there is a deadline that needs
> to be met, we compare various options and decide on which to go with.
>
> I'm on the First step still.
>
In that case you should read my txo bitfield proposal, instead of taking my
postings yesterday as a prompt to respond to something completely unrelated.
> If you really want to push me to saying it, I'm not a fan of the Patricia
> Tree for bitcoin txos. I think its too much work for everyone to do when
> other options are available. But I'm not trying to say that your design is
> bad or wont work... I'm just personally not interested in it at this time.
>
My bitfield proposal is different from the patricia trie stuff. Also your
objection about patricia tries being 'too much work' is nonsensical because
they're quite a bit simpler than MMRs.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1599 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-02 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-01 20:04 [bitcoin-dev] Guessing the spentness status of the pruned relatives praxeology_guy
2017-04-01 23:38 ` bfd
2017-04-02 1:10 ` praxeology_guy
2017-04-02 1:27 ` Bram Cohen
2017-04-02 1:58 ` praxeology_guy
2017-04-02 2:18 ` Bram Cohen [this message]
2017-04-02 3:37 ` praxeology_guy
2017-04-02 20:43 ` praxeology_guy
2017-04-03 3:13 ` Bram Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+KqGkpLJasuYqn9tzA_CUihwmoRqpQZ_exOUT_uqGYEesvceQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bram@bittorrent.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=praxeology_guy@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox