public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Backhaus <robbak@robbak.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Roadmap to getting users onto SPV clients
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 20:19:16 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+i0-i8JqW-wX6gMhJTjmbNfW9me1BifS635dnFrHT1A8KRpig@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKm8k+2nWgKbEL+iWp7-rmMXYJNsxWz6E9SFy8AMtWiRoead7g@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1414 bytes --]

On 5 December 2012 19:43, Gary Rowe <g.rowe@froot.co.uk> wrote:

> I would like to chime on on the user experience of the SPV client (in
> particular MultiBit).
>
> Without exception, everyone that I have introduced Bitcoin (which is a lot
> of people) have expected an "instant-on" experience. It has to clobber
> PayPal and credit cards or people won't give it a second look, let alone a
> second chance. SPV clients deliver on that expectation.
>
> Once the user has the great initial "wow!" moment then their interest in
> Bitcoin is reinforced and they tend to explore further, particularly into
> the economic theory behind it. Many decide to install the full node out of
> a sense of community contribution to the security of the network.
>
> Having a hybrid mode of SPV first then full node second should be
> something that a user has control over - it is their computing resources we
> are using after all and Bitcoin should not be perceived as a drain.


Hybrid SPV sounds like a good idea to me. Allows it to work out-of-the-box,
then slowly gets up-to-speed with the full network - working low priority,
or even not at all, if it detects a slow system or network link.
Another idea is always distributing the client with a checkpoint that is
only days old, then starting by pulling in more recent blocks, so it can
transact. Following that, it will pull in progressively older blocks as
time permits.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1730 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-05 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-04 17:46 [Bitcoin-development] Roadmap to getting users onto SPV clients Mike Hearn
2012-12-04 18:03 ` Alan Reiner
2012-12-04 18:08 ` Will
2012-12-04 18:17 ` Gregory Maxwell
2012-12-04 20:58   ` Mike Hearn
2012-12-04 21:41     ` Gregory Maxwell
2012-12-04 22:44       ` Alan Reiner
2012-12-05  0:27         ` Gregory Maxwell
2012-12-05  2:08           ` Alan Reiner
2012-12-05  2:54             ` Gregory Maxwell
2012-12-05  5:38               ` Jim Nguyen
2012-12-05  7:50                 ` Wladimir
2012-12-05  9:43                   ` Gary Rowe
2012-12-05 10:19                     ` Robert Backhaus [this message]
2012-12-05 10:43               ` Mike Hearn
2012-12-04 18:57 ` Mark Friedenbach
2012-12-04 19:36   ` Gregory Maxwell
     [not found] <mailman.70419.1354648162.2176.bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
2012-12-04 19:56 ` Jim
2012-12-04 22:23   ` slush

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+i0-i8JqW-wX6gMhJTjmbNfW9me1BifS635dnFrHT1A8KRpig@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=robbak@robbak.com \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox