This is not just "a political issue". The internet as we know it is at stake, and bitcoin depends directly on a working, single, globally connected internet (at least for now, until mesh networking goes anywhere...). 

*Everyone* using bitcoin has the interest in keeping the internet working and un-balkanized. That's not a political opinion, it's a fact.

The laws could also criminalize both the users and developers, if they regard bitcoin as a "payment network". And countries aren't too fussy about extradition to the US (see the case of Richard O'Dwyer).

Though I agree that SOPA and PIPA are just manifestations of a brand of censorship that is spreading all over the world. Stopping these laws won't solve the underlying issue either. Other countries will keep pushing for them, and we can't blank out the page for every country. 

However, that does not make the issue "political and thus meaningless". Also: "being too small to matter" is never a good argument to not do something. It is fear paralysis.

Wladimir

2012/1/17 Jorge Timón <timon.elviejo@gmail.com>
It may be a political issue, but I don't think wikipedia becomes a
political organization for being against censorship.
This is not about left or right. Is about free speech, one of the
basic principles not only of freedom but also of democracy.
And as Gregory shows it clearly affects bitcoin directly.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development