From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XFj4l-0003ej-OS for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 12:15:15 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.223.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.223.180; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com; helo=mail-ie0-f180.google.com; Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1XFj4k-0007KK-Qv for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 12:15:15 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id at20so6359603iec.11 for ; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 05:15:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.38.137 with SMTP id c9mr2407643ice.94.1407500109557; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 05:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.27.228 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 05:15:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 14:15:09 +0200 Message-ID: From: Wladimir To: Jeff Garzik Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (laanwj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1XFj4k-0007KK-Qv Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_EXT_SERVICES and advertising related services X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 12:15:15 -0000 > Generally agreed, though for ZMQ it is a bit different than a P2P service. > > IMO, ZMQ really wants to be a plug-in that registers some internal > signals. It wants to capture the precise points where a block was > accepted internally. PR #4599 tries to lead by example: > https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/4599 > > A P2P service would be a slightly different sort of plug-in. ZeroMQ is just a lightweight message routing system. It could just as well make P2P messages available to other applications (if they subscribe to them). The other way around, routing messages from ZeroMQ to certain P2P clients, is easy. Wladimir