From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TMGgl-0005jW-Ag for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:12:27 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.212.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.169; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f169.google.com; Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1TMGgf-0004PQ-RN for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:12:27 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hq4so6204849wib.4 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 04:12:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.91.71 with SMTP id cc7mr1564232wib.2.1349953935741; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 04:12:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.6.73 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 04:12:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:12:15 +0200 Message-ID: From: Wladimir To: Jeff Garzik Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (laanwj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1TMGgf-0004PQ-RN Cc: Bitcoin Development Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Post-0.7.1 tree freeze for ultraprune X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:12:27 -0000 On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Wladimir wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Proposal: following 0.7.1 release, freeze the tree. Do not pull >> anything, until ultraprune is pulled (or rejected, but I think the >> latter is unlikely). > > Yes, I think this is a good idea. Getting ultraprune in should be a priority. > > I've just pulled all the small stuff that was already ACKed for > post-0.7.1, so IMO the freeze can start. Oops, in my enthusiasm I completely forgot that 0.7.1 is still in rc, not final. What I merged is: - #1901 from laanwj/2012_10_remove_strlcpy - #1900 from Diapolo/optionsmodel_getters - #1913 from sipa/noi2p - #1879 from sipa/fdatasync I don't think any of them is problematic to have in rc2. If it is, we need to make a branch for 0.7.x at eb49457 and consider master the 0.8.x branch. Wladimir