From: Matias Alejo Garcia <matias@bitpay.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] BIP32 Index Randomisation
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:48:05 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+vKqYfG=SoNAgTeD0C_Q7F2p6MWdWE90u7728g9s3=nkmNi4w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1367 bytes --]
Hello everyone,
We are working on bitcore-wallet-server (BWS), a HD multisig wallet
'facilitator'. We have a couple of questions regarding BIP32 path usage,
and we would love to have feedback from you before moving forward.
Currently the BWS instances hold the set of extended public keys of the
wallet's peers to be able to derive addresses.
Since this is a problem from the privacy point of view, we thought using
pseudo-random BIP32 paths, with a seed only known be the peers, so the
server will be able to verify that addresses submitted by peers belong to
the wallet, but will not be able to derive future wallet addresses.
The workflow would be something like:
```
Peer > getCurrentIndex
< Server [index]
Peer:
pathSeed = PRNG(seed, index);
Peer > createAddress(index, pathSeed);
Server:
derives the address and add it to the wallet.
< Server new address
Peer: Verifies the address and inform it the user.
```
This way, accessing server data won't reveal future wallet addresses. The
seed (only known by the peers) could
be derived from hashes of their xprivs, so wallet funds can still be
recover with:
1) The complete set of xprivs
2) The quorum of xprivs + the complete set of xpubs + the address seed.
Thanks a lot in advance for any comment on this schema.
matías
--
BitPay.com
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1898 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2015-03-13 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 3:48 Matias Alejo Garcia [this message]
2015-03-13 4:01 ` [Bitcoin-development] BIP32 Index Randomisation Gregory Maxwell
2015-03-13 16:40 ` Mike Hearn
2015-03-13 18:01 ` Matias Alejo Garcia
2015-03-13 18:04 ` Mike Hearn
2015-03-13 20:26 ` Matias Alejo Garcia
2015-03-13 21:34 ` Mike Hearn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+vKqYfG=SoNAgTeD0C_Q7F2p6MWdWE90u7728g9s3=nkmNi4w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=matias@bitpay.com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox