From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <hearn@vinumeris.com> Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77CF0884 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:26:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ig0-f169.google.com (mail-ig0-f169.google.com [209.85.213.169]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A73211E for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbkq10 with SMTP id kq10so113812825igb.0 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 03:26:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vinumeris.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=G3Ph8plZp+DSYMPKd+2fZObCmSGzvUy3m6L5NgnuTdM=; b=e7EjLtHahvdjJgObJAMRfxbMITMMjoRbGAzZPKnMIxL4nKEkVYyj7zRL2S6f4mBuNU 3x2Q1yUwagIAndYh+bYhsqf18GsbYorhUD6zS5uyZK9PmKVqu9Fmc/60RmO+PMbQNiXF ERXMD3wmDJOFQcLQg62cFVGBu5yP08aXj08VI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=G3Ph8plZp+DSYMPKd+2fZObCmSGzvUy3m6L5NgnuTdM=; b=mdN3yhKAWDszs/mEEokCEQWm//PYj90i9oRV+9zyBP90nyHRKWKeh0RZ7qsRIFTJ7h vsghn0WTQDMPTtOAkVw1ESIHMQbl0FYeNyUmjTpF18NVgZLvHmqz2pwNniPfwfL6WiC2 2VEZtUsRrmfUa4l/zo4g2S3KVplAVKi2f/6SukG+6FjpujOxzesTPW6XwLB7/JyDTqZ0 cYWIShsz1JJxlhXVwgz4Vi/KWVH104YEnZR0pyNf1Vm28NfvejMXRW4UZHhVbbiFHGac wV+rg919w12UNS2dx4B53QuFCcxRe5QqFKAVUSLU+5JCqKF0X1PcICrmgbtFQW473JNk FYWA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmSb3HADoU7jOKo0AUhx7vpl9ytGlK73wD4cWkWTxH20VumRFd9GcJr+cdZAihYctpJEkH2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.61.34 with SMTP id m2mr2105709igr.34.1446028016423; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 03:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.123.166 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 03:26:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T32Y94cXyubaedpicH=izCEBBN662b0oTNSi5sN6hnM=w@mail.gmail.com> References: <878u6velnc.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <CA+w+GKSo75Y3bum+NOVjvaSiqyAozirg=PUrF-3ACg5GRXcp2w@mail.gmail.com> <CABsx9T32Y94cXyubaedpicH=izCEBBN662b0oTNSi5sN6hnM=w@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:26:56 +0100 Message-ID: <CA+w+GKRcR2jL_39NuS-Yvu1xLc4y6A4tU5dxDN9+5Z2jUc_mrg@mail.gmail.com> From: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com> To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135e084416cfc052327a222 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Mailing List Moderation Now Active. X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:26:57 -0000 --001a1135e084416cfc052327a222 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This post by Gavin got rejected by the moderators. Without a doubt this moderation policy is already a disaster. I'm fully expecting this message to get rejected too, but so you can see it Rusty: so far in the reject bin there are messages from: - Well known uber-troll Gavin Andresen - And his partner in crime, Sergio Damian Lerner - Someone discussing a bug - Someone who wants to discuss CLTV - Someone pointing out that censorship of technical discussion is rarely a good idea - Someone pointing out that censorship of people complaining about censorship is also taking place. WTF? --001a1135e084416cfc052327a222 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">This post by Gavin got rejected by the moderators.<div><br= ></div><div>Without a doubt this moderation policy is already a disaster. I= 'm fully expecting this message to get rejected too, but so you can see= it Rusty: so far in the reject bin there are messages from:</div><div><ul>= <li>Well known uber-troll Gavin Andresen</li><li>And his partner in crime, = Sergio Damian Lerner</li><li>Someone discussing a bug</li><li>Someone who w= ants to discuss CLTV</li><li>Someone pointing out that censorship of techni= cal discussion is rarely a good idea</li><li>Someone pointing out that cens= orship of people complaining about censorship is also taking place.</li></u= l><div>WTF?</div></div></div> --001a1135e084416cfc052327a222--