From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E0DA68 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:53:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-io0-f175.google.com (mail-io0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C964516F for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iodb91 with SMTP id b91so108059605iod.1 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:53:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vinumeris.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cUmHP+tQLWSxkx+BqNO2Vq9g7PMdWBLyk2T+hDCyICA=; b=FHZM0gG3Nw7cIQUz01u5QpayGvzEQmvdJMB9gpxcGW7MT1iig4gjZa8PhspIGeM5c/ cA60MmgwWVTJEWPyUq/vWa/B91n+pKgPiEfJHttt4bh+t70EchxSnDUxdcfj3Fn772/0 zncLO7MmGJjo+fveONAIOkAF1/Mv/pLY7Km9c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cUmHP+tQLWSxkx+BqNO2Vq9g7PMdWBLyk2T+hDCyICA=; b=krGPNw1HRVwlQv73dcl2IlaS1cgnRN6sD+Yjz/n0uLHQxyIubvCfZzfLGvZkeLlh1j 5hlhZia6yHKAXDznImw5vo0UjZjiey/X7woZFQE12HwcLlDw08L6Urua/cqGf9N2Kto6 Od/f+AflZ7LCdt9LOddqjORAGcpAluRUM3lyq+VCpKvW4f4/3i7+Gv6RdL+c83Ke3sAD qbDz4cOtKcqw+n/Lbf5Tsbsas2KNE1BFEjy+sodkEZdLdFOf76mhCl1FcOsXiLXJZvRC 3jHFwtsr1ZgCe4YZzNAKDPFSeHLvq1p8hZ5RkKwjAUtGEC16EOaaf1YMsK32P9V2ifjp F77g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk7zDW5n2b7Y2GZvFBbKqLfiMgiZEa1oVaPSOe1TMiwkAMKFCcIoYTiTBRaxyw3henvTwy6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.36.134 with SMTP id k128mr21113599iok.113.1439211217175; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:53:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.108.111 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:53:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55C75FC8.6070807@jrn.me.uk> <55C77E80.3060203@jrn.me.uk> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 14:53:37 +0200 Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140ebae5b5ea2051cf47907 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Alternative chain support for payment protocol X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:53:38 -0000 --001a1140ebae5b5ea2051cf47907 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 We're not modifying BIP 70, it's now immutable and can only be extended. There's really not much point in having a dedicated chain ID for regtest mode. You shouldn't be finding BIP70 requests for regtest outside of your own developer machine, where the id doesn't matter. --001a1140ebae5b5ea2051cf47907 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We're not modifying BIP 70, it's now immutable and= can only be extended.

There's really not much point= in having a dedicated chain ID for regtest mode. You shouldn't be find= ing BIP70 requests for regtest outside of your own developer machine, where= the id doesn't matter.
--001a1140ebae5b5ea2051cf47907--