From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 615EE892 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 11:47:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com (mail-la0-f48.google.com [209.85.215.48]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88BAE109 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 11:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by laba3 with SMTP id a3so20844754lab.1 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:47:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=cB8UyY9pPNZWJWLrUIfGfsHTUvalRInLA+5JQAgYbTA=; b=cTxR+EufJXcvw9uNGhgM7ge/oLnX+Au7N1dj4l+rq87IX68Y3zV7xXI7HbZg4icHOf wABdZZuu3ohgN6TbPi03GwNK5u3fS/LV8ZjMzNiExJppZVG3uQroc/n7FLJco1QDSmD4 T5uWmY0WMHz72dV8wryEVgdLbIH17p1AjRI8MauQCpZxRmFfGTUB98RwE25mt4u6XFPe an4hNdAIc/CF1ZwNNNUywXh5ShL8OeWF/c8EnH75JpTbGPNjim6JXsWp2v7QUFmJy1wn VDv/xi5FV+hiCWJ8aWR0vlytYZm0Lk5eTBSnOcHOW9cGukqM2Z6clJBhGstW2sHTYa/q hDoQ== X-Received: by 10.112.148.130 with SMTP id ts2mr2548935lbb.17.1440071234696; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:47:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.22.25 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 04:46:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55D5BAE1.4090101@bitcoins.info> References: <55D1167B.1060107@gmail.com> <55D124D7.4050209@gmail.com> <61AD0CE6-014E-44E2-B9C7-00B35D2E09CC@petertodd.org> <55D4A3BD.2060706@sky-ip.org> <55D5AB11.3090307@sky-ip.org> <55D5BAE1.4090101@bitcoins.info> From: Hector Chu Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:46:54 +0100 Message-ID: To: Milly Bitcoin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT 0.11A X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 11:47:17 -0000 Security is provided via POW. If you want the chains to stop attacking each other, change the POW algorithms. Then it wouldn't matter if one chain was longer than another, each fork would select the best chain according to their valid version of POW algorithm. If Bitcoin Core loses miner majority to XT this is probably what it will have to do to maintain security of its chain. On 20 August 2015 at 12:32, Milly Bitcoin via bitcoin-dev wrote: >> The same with -XT, nobody should be able to affect the entire bitcoin >> ecosystem regardless how many miners or bitcoin companies you can lobby. >> If this is possible, then Bitcoin is not as secure as we thought. > > > Bitcoin is only as secure as the developers, users, and miners allow it to > be. If you can get the majority of developers, users, and miners to do > insecure things then Bitcoin will be insecure. > > Russ > > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev