From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] The difficulty of writing consensus critical code: the SIGHASH_SINGLE bug
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 02:04:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQ6rtMdbq9SYFfthJiZW040dg=qzbNLP=HMmgoxszB8Hw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141106231225.GA26859@savin.petertodd.org>
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> BIP62 does make life easier for wallet authors as they don't have to
> deal with malleability - maybe! -
Yes, I agree for most contract purposes CTLV is what you want to be
using, instead of refund transactions beyond being more clearly
correct, it shrinks the protocol state machine by one step.
Though BIP62 also achieves the secondary goal of making required
implementation behaviour more explicit (e.g. the parts enforced in all
transactions), and that shouldn't be discounted.
They're somewhat orthogonal, somwhat complementary things.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-07 2:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-06 21:32 [Bitcoin-development] The difficulty of writing consensus critical code: the SIGHASH_SINGLE bug Peter Todd
2014-11-06 21:58 ` Tamas Blummer
2014-11-06 22:05 ` Matt Corallo
2014-11-06 22:11 ` Jeff Garzik
2014-11-06 22:48 ` Justus Ranvier
2014-11-06 23:26 ` Peter Todd
2014-11-06 23:36 ` Justus Ranvier
2014-11-07 0:03 ` Peter Todd
2014-11-07 8:07 ` Tamas Blummer
2014-11-07 8:48 ` Peter Todd
2014-11-07 11:30 ` Clément Elbaz
2014-11-07 11:47 ` Peter Todd
2014-11-07 12:01 ` Wladimir
2014-11-07 16:52 ` Mike Hearn
2014-11-15 4:43 ` Jean-Pierre Rupp
2014-11-06 23:19 ` Peter Todd
2014-11-06 23:12 ` Peter Todd
2014-11-07 2:04 ` Gregory Maxwell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAAS2fgQ6rtMdbq9SYFfthJiZW040dg=qzbNLP=HMmgoxszB8Hw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=gmaxwell@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=pete@petertodd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox