From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56F5992F for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 19:05:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ua0-f171.google.com (mail-ua0-f171.google.com [209.85.217.171]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFD7F17E for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 19:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f171.google.com with SMTP id j18so11678003uae.12 for ; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 12:05:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=JAXB1COeNTgJo6UmLvHlCTfaGafwGkfys7ARb1X/hN0=; b=mxmW6BKydMknHht2TF/N+bpgyKCkjFURFOJmoaOh/4ETYqUZMNC/mjvYNaksayukcr I+NOtF9Kw3OCddsG4am93Eo0IhIggUC45xM5kwugVjMrxL522n96i3b3qhWB4yF+TiVF sG2N37n/932PDTVRAFltEXtyPrsqy89dWooPCRCrxlsFUOirWRizUf8a8xnpEfUVjBss cuGhrlAIb/5IHG0Rhh78b9K0DD5jsiBpQLYOHbZ9HZLgkQ7q+72/g35fKQPTOG6TYt+g ObUmP38428yvz0kv1lIzTbi9ydsBROH4pEyJBWD4SYKDYfjmN6Doblkpts7y/l1DBUeI KESg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JAXB1COeNTgJo6UmLvHlCTfaGafwGkfys7ARb1X/hN0=; b=ZDP52QDB8IkgJlPDtApbhVek1uaVMGhK5x5nVzmneNDiwGNjac+GmoQsc+l5vLCq5O vGd+TyIkR+geRsArCT6AqubzV/MNBUzMLkwMT53DkOrU5nTzAk+E0UZyeb8hKEQn2h2H f1iLPOTbgmXG90fduk52wLRwfles99rDyd6XQBNTSuqMsC1DSYyAfUOCfCYu0Yd69iD0 C2CZFhTieV2ft9VaLDmKOwaWLw4hy3Pzxtbuj/sO2TEas1rKCDbSUqrcDOUpoJFAilum qep6jzN4e3vBnXskNBBys5OqtNDVwEyONbC0uxHQoE77iqrvGrB8zFFABl9qT/Jfb4rg mUsg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBPE9tgGhqYNLzI5NW7vg2sJC9hTgQOFBH7xg8wGX0W3V2Rxf8e 2/JoMLnHIuo3cjW+RePLDdWMY4y2fe9tXDuA75DdqQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/BpRHlqrDOVxGTFqZQaQKEHlTTlHjiGx0AAMlk1VuTT9cFuUlw7TKDtnx58BSwfLjjUoVy07rW4PWi3Nld2b8= X-Received: by 10.176.67.229 with SMTP id l92mr9170606ual.27.1522782340836; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.222.17 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9ab6e32e-db51-4ce4-8f3c-3a77f7b1f9bd@Spark> References: <9ab6e32e-db51-4ce4-8f3c-3a77f7b1f9bd@Spark> From: Gregory Maxwell Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 19:05:40 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: sp6q0TFh7YA0uHthA7BKMYxnZKk Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Low-bandwidth transaction relay X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 19:05:42 -0000 On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 10:18 PM, Gleb Naumenko via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Hi all, > I have a couple of ideas regarding transaction relay protocol and wanted to > share it with and probably get some feedback. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1377345.0 https://people.xiph.org/~greg/mempool_sync_relay.txt