From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YIT7K-0003HA-BF for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 02:21:30 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.180; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f180.google.com; Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com ([209.85.213.180]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YIT7J-0003Vp-KL for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 02:21:30 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b16so21462943igk.1 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:21:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.143.38 with SMTP id sb6mr15455342igb.40.1422930084351; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:21:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.107.6.18 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:21:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <87egqnwt7g.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 02:21:24 +0000 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Pieter Wuille Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1YIT7J-0003Vp-KL Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 02:21:30 -0000 On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Pieter Wuille wrote: > The much simpler alternative is just adding this to BIP66's DERSIG > right now, which is a one-line change that's obviously softforking. Is > anyone opposed to doing so at this stage? Thats my preference.