From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4028CB68 for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 17:50:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ua0-f182.google.com (mail-ua0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4906227 for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 17:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f182.google.com with SMTP id j17so82665575uag.3 for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 10:50:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cwTFdQFdQ4Kvdem9g6nbpkQkpYOQbAdMop7qowDpLAI=; b=vhzkUqXrkaf0TZDHCGECjfq84X0TEDU5IFYEQVKJQVlZ3CXY/pDYFkLnGE7nEp6dOU nVDwL9b5k8zjjzd8/QTjGpV15OkKULoMkPq9ekMhLK1DNWjYz44hluOPrkslVhu+Nnps BnODfWpaAGWhQl5lRSmnB19IkKEg9vrwuJzjjrxEfIj4WwJuuUg/lXfEOE8auLgPEXRl ovaHKPQ+o4dILlTXMCTQGCdqMc46wa5bpzSJHeHdfGihSFyB8Hk9lK7DuYfwaOLlHpM+ 4YNmvvqivgciQ6TTHGP6rvNZfFL1Se9lwTurVbUwQiYatMZE5axLfTD7ue2xXf1MbMbg NHHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=cwTFdQFdQ4Kvdem9g6nbpkQkpYOQbAdMop7qowDpLAI=; b=sJBMtnaNR60ytPs69s7mkzzC9h89kLVu1e9UEo0xk/qUIia2NlaR2++fWndkxryr6R O+3dDPKSehjLy8j77Wdao2W/oNWJ7E3NGc6/sFJEsw1L/mT+k57rpc1ZCcVBDprKE3Vw Y4q+HRmzOIfll/+8K3J621THomrGrM2XjzJ1CX4VmKE8Gs72072w6AYu6gehFkNSVcl5 pvPv+ULF1DuuDe7kplbVkPueggmfXByrF+Q4s57h23ZtJCEtCOw6yE/jfZyPI9UdZ0sr o0Xxl/03H07alRuPvXTIzAAd6ndTAiX3t5NB9gzwXhcOx4YOVMIfUXP7RFbu/H8L8QXb mtbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCvqiVWNjzaiBhlkKdFJYszBSmcE7tnJMZDKBzWo8Jq2iiz3Gdq 9pUI2n5220dY4R6+mO0enAeea6wBcw== X-Received: by 10.176.4.85 with SMTP id 79mr13680130uav.88.1495561812897; Tue, 23 May 2017 10:50:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.20.66 with HTTP; Tue, 23 May 2017 10:50:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Gregory Maxwell Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 17:50:12 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: t4fPhqrsUjtw1YOi2AmWXnh_yNI Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP149 timeout-- why so far in the future? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 17:50:14 -0000 Based on how fast we saw segwit adoption, why is the BIP149 timeout so far in the future? It seems to me that it could be six months after release and hit the kind of density required to make a stable transition. (If it were a different proposal and not segwit where we already have seen what network penetration looks like-- that would be another matter.)