From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UFU7D-00041L-Io for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:39:59 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.217.173 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.173; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-lb0-f173.google.com; Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com ([209.85.217.173]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1UFU79-0004Gb-JH for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:39:59 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id gf7so249626lbb.32 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:39:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.125.239 with SMTP id mt15mr14943562lab.26.1363113588807; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:39:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.96.164 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:39:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <513ED35A.8080203@gmail.com> <201303121210.34515.luke@dashjr.org> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:39:48 -0700 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Alan Reiner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1UFU79-0004Gb-JH Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Some PR preparation X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:39:59 -0000 On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Peter Vessenes wrote: >> Can some enterprising soul determine if there were any double-spend attempts? >> I'm assuming no, and if that's the case, we should talk about that publicly. [snip] > I agree it would be good to confirm no one was ripped off, even though > we can't say there weren't any attempts. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=152348.msg1616747#msg1616747