From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1X7ryh-0005lD-TG for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:08:31 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.215.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.41; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-la0-f41.google.com; Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1X7ryg-0004dN-QS for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:08:31 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id s18so2135946lam.14 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 13:08:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.6.170 with SMTP id c10mr35747452laa.9.1405627704202; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 13:08:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.35.138 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 13:08:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 13:08:24 -0700 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Jeremy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1X7ryg-0004dN-QS Cc: Bitcoin Development Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Pay to MultiScript hash: X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:08:32 -0000 On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Jeremy wrote: > Hey all, > I had an idea for a new transaction type. The base idea is that it is > matching on script hashes much like pay to script hash, but checks for one > of N scripts. This seems strictly less flexible and efficient than the Merkelized Abstract Syntax Tree construction, though perhaps slightly easier to implement it wouldn't be any easier to deploy. Something like this was very recently proposed on this list (by Tier Nolan), you might want to see the "Selector Script" thread.