From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1V1jXb-0002ap-HO for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:50:39 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.44; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-la0-f44.google.com; Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1V1jXX-0000bt-OH for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:50:39 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id er20so6642945lab.3 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:50:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.18.165 with SMTP id x5mr9998931lbd.62.1374612628950; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:50:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.160.104 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:50:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:50:28 -0700 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Mike Hearn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.3 URI_HEX URI: URI hostname has long hexadecimal sequence 0.0 NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR URI: Uses a numeric IP address in URL -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1V1jXX-0000bt-OH Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Linux packaging letter X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:50:39 -0000 On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Mike Hearn wrote: > Yes. Someone decided to actually delete the people who had signed so far = and Some people/person went and actually started making substantive edits to the text. The text it's rolled back to is missing the last copyedits from last night = too. The text that had been ACKed last night was a3e52973, available at http://luke.dashjr.org/tmp/code/20130723-linux-distribution-packaging-and-b= itcoin.md As far as the PGP goes=E2=80=94 I think using the PGP is good: it's making use of the right tools, avoids issues like we just had where people go changing the content after names had been affixed, shows solidarity with people building security infrastructure that our ecosystem depends on. If you only use it occasionally then its easy for someone to strip it when it _is_ needed and disguise that just as regular non-use. It's my general view that for people working in our domain basic competence and use of these tools, even when they kinda stink, is a kind of civic hygiene. At the same time it's not urgent. It's poorly used by people and will be ignored by most but packagers are the most frequent users of it that I've encountered. Fortunately, it's harmless in any case. If people are interested in offering PGP signatures of it: wget http://luke.dashjr.org/tmp/code/20130723-linux-distribution-packaging-= and-bitcoin.md gpg --clearsign 20130723-linux-distribution-packaging-and-bitcoin.md and post the little signature asc. The result composes nicely: http://luke.dashjr.org/tmp/code/20130723-linux-distribution-packaging-and-b= itcoin.md.asc