[Bitcoin-development] Lost proposals from FellowTraveler/Monetas

[Bitcoin-development] Lost proposals from FellowTraveler/Monetas

[Gregory Maxwell]

Is there any discussion thats been had relating to the BIP-drafts at:

https://github.com/Open-Transactions/rfc/tree/master/bips

Fellow Traveler has apparently been waiting 9 months for progress on
these proposals and I'm trying to find out where the breakdown
happened. While do not doubt that I am somehow at fault, I can't
figure out how.

Searching my email and this list archive for "Base58 Serialization for
Transaction-Based Color Descriptors" or "Order-based Smart Property
Coloring" or the draft names bip-ccids, etc. turn up no hits at all.
I've asked several other people and there list archives show nothing.

Has anyone else taken part in discussions related to these proposals
(or seen them all before)? If so, please point me to the discussion.

Otherwise I'll just go ahead and create threads for each under the
assumption that there is yet another mailing list screwup. :(

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lost proposals from FellowTraveler/Monetas

[Justus Ranvier]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2002 bytes --]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA512


On 2015-06-16 23:32, Gregory Maxwell wrote:

> Is there any discussion thats been had relating to the BIP-drafts at:

>

> https://github.com/Open-Transactions/rfc/tree/master/bips

>

> Fellow Traveler has apparently been waiting 9 months for progress on

> these proposals and I'm trying to find out where the breakdown

> happened. While do not doubt that I am somehow at fault, I can't

> figure out how.

>

> Searching my email and this list archive for "Base58 Serialization for

> Transaction-Based Color Descriptors" or "Order-based Smart Property

> Coloring" or the draft names bip-ccids, etc. turn up no hits at all.

> I've asked several other people and there list archives show nothing.


The only two proposals we sent to the mailing list were attached to this
post:


http://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/message/32736455/


The rest of the proposals in that respository, as well as those the fork
here:


https://github.com/Monetas/rfc/tree/master/bips


were never submitted because we decided to use alternative identifiers in
leiu of BIP numbers to serve as the purpose code in the HD path.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Version: GnuPG v2


iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVgLRaAAoJECpf2nDq2eYjw7YQAJYrciEZZeasEJRR7XwZ5AWQ

9e/pz1SV2hoRs7TqHgHoXGINLbG9LwlXFmnoG14z+vwKvheJxlC6gOQCRIRwPfrR

zwuQWyoONHn82XL44ABqjnu0fmeh7egx3FIzsgDUxUgiP5dA0BuQvrT1+DptfJ+p

5sM7ZvRqfZJbek4AHk9Y4kERQYsP4HKgC1W3Acr1In9WPSj5TRtYz7tUK+SFcO+m

A3Ny5dUiAmmf5mfLZiWrEmCG34n+cCJZEU2hlQqH5ZuAHPmeTLuar91MLj/1Xltf

OFlMGhmUPy1alTx8o39nwRjfXIVQLk7/D5YB3gB2CUuXd+sWbY+6LUyniOKtQK3C

EmEDOUFSNm4JV1AmM+ea1HUufCJfkg1VHko4hsIyc1e7ztdECIzPQKAy7DAcu1YS

BhbkxNyaUqoF+J/ggrXhT/r5oVpWsifdj4IEzaMvmOxu+p+hTkzzwitLuyknEBZE

b2KWRMWNOheVpDp7RmrcTPqa4S1N8XcfJazDyigIhl0E/Bjk+pC1SHo7IIEMZMQ+

Fz7JaALd8XK0l7HBvvJnZmYwVLnQyB01B6n7z8eTTAneHhSXxa7Z1aFTkYU8Wp9o

L5nb1K7gJtjBFqhLi3PMLRhARao1Q/CK5bDt9Mb3VMy9jAIr9X9/NcL473cbHtQH

/h91bhkL9bvvkeCl5yQk

=NgfK

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4720 bytes --]