From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B33D13 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 04:15:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ua0-f196.google.com (mail-ua0-f196.google.com [209.85.217.196]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08B226DB for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 04:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f196.google.com with SMTP id x18-v6so9760389uaj.9 for ; Thu, 31 May 2018 21:15:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=ROe+EJcHtzDVgVfREK3luclNc53mlrHd3VzQn0UElAc=; b=oYSDuFFQJ6kQsiFq2qaMEoVhRr7UFTZSwe2Ex/VS5lB6c7qTh1RdVDwtf+/p4d1x8r jVRvufd+MU2b9+KR6h5VwegcSCD5L/L5U5NMlxEclg7RPykEOUqBxNLDb/muKPF9fBdE csF/qpnGbHI41Q9FjGYVFe5DhQWvYmxP3BVjN7EPRIdGuDxEoK3/Tm3h2T8iUXpLdZqh 7l4in/ePRjANoZ6QqjkDYpEZsZ7mSht3E/u+JebQdxGatN+N2BK6N1J29/ey1GGXAeId fow1qpok6kx8x/LrDoPaZpXcIspCDdpk9PqJ2N80nZAGcdKiC3GY3lE1pnqbAoQsw5ee WR1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ROe+EJcHtzDVgVfREK3luclNc53mlrHd3VzQn0UElAc=; b=F3pLAtuEVXtNAlmv7jwWWuhiSZoj3QiBPKBFWLF1alQaXAI6CVab8+aHtt251hEx6W 3MxX3nsrrBPmuGhvg9NFdEUXTsKaJUpZB6XgMmaA+6paRpWtD7o3cm1z2xVxVANm0MJp e7JJummvTWU9kRlsPbmi1mb73PYEUaUkzPdr1MnPTRyCO2w6PUL3F2lnstgGdhxtTBhb OOoKhI/d6wSM3oJGrVW+eOxPM/KgP9IjonTa4rodU8SFHhgCxi6AzrFj+6h0kcxmPh9z zijwBeRKfJBAk6Sa9vKYnuuJwr1A6O6+HPXnS7NwPvlG9GTio4RqOnyqelKHTwXs+E/H gZBA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwdbvPrDH+nDP4a3lwH20B5gQiVNlrZ05JOuX39xfn6IP76DNirj U16yJtm+D03xx9hjIeFS813VM+pVZky+bW0BYTdFjA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKhVXiXATDybdTIKr9Re8WUif7u5awjVO3Hkp78lL56Ny0ty2DazvCh/Je0kV96RjeL2L9g5lcFLBuANePvo4o= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:3b06:: with SMTP id i6-v6mr6380340uah.75.1527826513996; Thu, 31 May 2018 21:15:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a67:5193:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 31 May 2018 21:15:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <22d375c7-a032-8691-98dc-0e6ee87a4b08@mattcorallo.com> <7E4FA664-BBAF-421F-8C37-D7CE3AA5310A@gmail.com> From: Gregory Maxwell Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 04:15:13 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NXfXkXpihbjpD6QXWVyWHNPAJW8 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 158 Flexibility and Filter Size X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 04:15:16 -0000 On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Olaoluwa Osuntokun via bitcoin-dev wrote: > One notable thing that I left off is the proposed change to use the previous > output script rather than the outpoint. Modifying the filters in this > fashion would be a downgrade in the security model for light clients, as it Only if you make a very strong assumption about the integrity of the nodes the client is talkign to. A typical network attacker (e.g. someone on your lan or wifi segmet, or someone who has compromised or operates an upstream router) can be all of your peers. The original propsal for using these kinds of maps was that their digests could eventually be commited and then checked against the commitment, matching the same general security model used otherwise in SPV. Unfortunately, using the scripts instead of the outpoints takes us further away from a design that is optimized for committing (or, for that matter, use purely locally by a wallet)...