From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E824B721 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:26:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ua0-f180.google.com (mail-ua0-f180.google.com [209.85.217.180]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ED8013B for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f180.google.com with SMTP id l94so35582118ual.0 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:26:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=OKFMkaD1R8R23W5tqhb7lHqr1fv72zpf7JDzdlh7BRU=; b=Vu92N+1EwydTLV5MiaEURcBi3Od7L1GLeXNTxL/Nu/uPdaKd4cjMxrYSXWJxmg4/Mt gHKxvoCoMnEORi0XlrFJ4YuLpsM5Pf8N7FYaSDiOv4JpfOLyT7/y3w6aGRYyWDAuuzj5 KwFzbLdcAHo8SQncabUNYpmYurCRxW5YQW4i4MCH/o4gfeXfS4gE+f1Vrk+BnpyqixBZ stSRL2DGNHa2EtRzfzJCinWbKxE3gMyJLBYXAqDIQeU0OG/WRlXCUKj3BO0wkZl7XQXc OpaMgBs96+wGs/hvVytK4wIm/tia2OZI0TL69G1naySi9JM7OD19RNmCRLow1jBmtOWW IXxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OKFMkaD1R8R23W5tqhb7lHqr1fv72zpf7JDzdlh7BRU=; b=Tcc6eMjoVRftrFrkNLFuS4IskE7BJMNwLyEIHkXDlRUM6oIOLRONqYfLmE8P8rioRR rmkyBd0Lu5vlRtTIsObri1B5/ou7a91rtj9ddZDfeI3bj05InrzCSaF6YuLlwtut1K9G g2B3w94j973K2mCJZ07a1usF+J79IYQezsM1byEbCaJn9b/kDs41Y2oAjcWyeWcytc3t XPkKK4RUcTH+GMxU7+Fmz7bcfatxK0nWFvDscm3DRUGBDKvfEOm2qNsMNZDMcRv5z3bo 4Se+OptwV1nO042EG/2nCch3GlH6XeUPOnGmsYtp5oHA4JI8KWEcXKeXrhPlNNEeCncK YtWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwO5cbBaZumOzI5acCKYDzX2bRJXnDF1DFbpc/GT+9vhs9kARiCJCK4gZiEmX0GdqkE+nyKm9y1i4KbsPw== X-Received: by 10.176.68.226 with SMTP id n89mr5529271uan.98.1472149582616; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:26:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.118.69 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:26:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160825142732.GA11295@nex> References: <20160824014634.GA19905@fedora-21-dvm> <20160825142732.GA11295@nex> From: Gregory Maxwell Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:26:21 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: clHMX3ieNoiXrIk9jyuJFqjf580 Message-ID: To: Christian Decker , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capital Efficient Honeypots w/ "Scorched Earth" Doublespending Protection X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:26:24 -0000 On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Christian Decker via bitcoin-dev wrote: > If however > he is planning to use it as a foothold to further compromise your > company, send spam or similar, he will likely try to avoid these > tripwires. [...] Depends on the value of their activity compared to the value of the coins. Spamming doesn't pay much. Covert tripwires would obviously be better, but if shared tripwires allow you to have 100x the funds available it could be a good trade-off.