From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D346409
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:20:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (mail-ig0-f173.google.com
	[209.85.213.173])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B17B814D
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:20:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igxp17 with SMTP id p17so27597790igx.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=oipvRaLJwWrNbrrOs8RPzKDjgsoRWUSikrJt+QEEbTA=;
	b=H4v8BaWVGXPUT+J6YGVprpxBL2WrsBsjjEHobTAAcxrXvtmMr1SpsXH0ghSSQ9N2Zm
	LYd0zyQR36qh996Dbl24zdk/B+pKna+38SBaQGT1aT7o9aFB/0+iB07QgIi1RZcQ1eP/
	kVCSu4NX3s/NJGjzumpsN4iHkphDHWL4NsuEMKxXYYSUq/FJif06YJOOnHyOP/JQNSYI
	rRlPMmfdh9qzvPiAxDFYpE5EhX9mZEzHTS/xDi4IFJXTTUmGp0sn3DfAa/MDajgPJBg1
	vILnF/WXSy9m/KFvEhXTzOhRBnSWrvVvEX/DO8yTAsHzv7uZ6gSDeqEyJ7N7Vq5vBzBx
	+X1Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.59.242 with SMTP id c18mr30860140igr.66.1439493602150;
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.14.136 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOG=w-tLsDtNcXtYU=J7mNWYd8-4VGMVDGJp7Fm_BiVw-LXwhQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADJgMztgE_GkbrsP7zCEHNPA3P6T=aSFfhkcN-q=gVhWP0vKXg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOG=w-tLsDtNcXtYU=J7mNWYd8-4VGMVDGJp7Fm_BiVw-LXwhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:20:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgRYrzcxt3ecrCXLHfV+bMXT7BD+n-K++cxhtyXrWLeEEg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP-draft] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - An opcode for
 relative locktime
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:20:03 -0000

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org> wrote:
> As per the rules of BIP 1, I hereby request that the BIP editor please
> assign an official number to this work. The idea has been discussed before
> on the bitcoin-dev mailing list:
>
> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/008452.html
>
> And a reference implementation is available here:
>
> https://github.com/maaku/bitcoin/tree/checksequenceverify

I think it's important to allow some time for discussion with the
actual proposed text up; as understandings can shift significantly. :)
Btcdrak already asked me for numbers prior to posting text at all and
I asked him to post text...