From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VBhPg-00077k-QG for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:35:40 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.215.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.50; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-la0-f50.google.com; Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1VBhPc-0000Uo-HF for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:35:40 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id ek20so87675lab.37 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 01:35:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.14.102 with SMTP id o6mr1751468lbc.28.1376987729784; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 01:35:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.89.72 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 01:35:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 01:35:29 -0700 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Bitcoin Development , Pieter Wuille Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1VBhPc-0000Uo-HF Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 32.5 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:35:41 -0000 On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > I am wondering if we shouldn't have a BIP32 addendum which makes the > following signing related recommendations: Looks like we're in the midst of another DSA duplicated K disaster. (Now, blockchain.info mywallet) I talked to Pieter about this some earlier today and he sounded pretty positive. I'll go ahead and start on an actual BIP document for it.