From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WWUPk-0008B8-R3 for Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 17:29:56 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.217.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.170; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-lb0-f170.google.com; Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com ([209.85.217.170]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WWUPk-0004bo-0e for Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 17:29:56 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id s7so3440331lbd.15 for ; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:29:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.143.99 with SMTP id sd3mr12878903lbb.11.1396718989356; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.89.68 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 10:29:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <533E29F0.1080901@jerviss.org> References: <1784069.HYVIiriube@crushinator> <533E29F0.1080901@jerviss.org> Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 10:29:49 -0700 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: kjj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 1.5 SF_NO_SPF_SPAM SF_NO_SPF_SPAM X-Headers-End: 1WWUPk-0004bo-0e Cc: Bitcoin Development Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Finite monetary supply for Bitcoin X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 17:29:57 -0000 On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:41 PM, kjj wrote: > At first, I thought this was a second April Fool's joke, but then I > looked and saw that all of the BIPs really do use this format. As far > as I can tell, we are using this insane format because RFC 822 predates > ISO 8601 by half a decade. In my opinion you can have whatever style you want on the BIPs, so long as you pledge to slay all who come and complain about the new style.