From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SuNWL-0003iS-D7 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:50:25 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.160.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.47; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-pb0-f47.google.com; Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1SuNWF-0001TW-VM for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:50:25 +0000 Received: by pbbrq2 with SMTP id rq2so2984763pbb.34 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:50:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.232.103 with SMTP id tn7mr4838567pbc.86.1343307014042; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.59.6 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:50:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:50:14 -0400 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Mike Hearn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1SuNWF-0001TW-VM Cc: Bitcoin Development Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin script opcode counts X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:50:25 -0000 On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Mike Hearn wrote: >> OP_CODESEPARATOR 14 >> OP_DEPTH 182 > > I'm interested to see what scripts were using OP_DEPTH and > OP_CODESEPARATOR, as the latter appears to be useless to my eyes. > > Could you give some tx ids which use unusual opcodes? The OP_DEPTH are all screwups in P2Pool blocks. ( the software was making tiny payments to scriptpubkey 'script' due to a bug, and it went unnoticed for a long time because it was assumed that it was just some p2sh user intentionally being stupid )