From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
To: Chris Priest <cp368202@ohiou.edu>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Forget dormant UTXOs without confiscating bitcoin
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 08:18:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgSchJFk1Ejd8ZfMSzxEO-1TWYR6ag-seQNH_QHrc9Cn3w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAcC9yuSX67ckhBUCsvTk+7PB6vzufuuBsJikSqqqU_4LXoCfA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Chris Priest <cp368202@ohiou.edu> wrote:
> Lets say it's 2050 and I want to sweep a paper wallet I created in
> 2013. I can't just make the TX and send it to the network, I have to
> first contact an "archive node" to get the UTXO data in order to make
> the TX. How is this better than how the system works today?
You already are in that boat. If your paper wallet has only the
private key (as 100% of them do today). You'll have no idea what coins
have been assigned to it, or what their TXids are. You'll need to
contact a public index (which isn't a service existing nodes provide)
or synchronize the full blockchain history to find it. Both are also
sufficient for jl2012's (/Petertodd's STXO), they'd only be providing
you with somewhat more data. If instead, you insist that you'd
already be running a full node and not have to wait for the sync, then
again you'd also be your own archive. In none of these cases do you
lose anything.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-13 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-12 20:09 [bitcoin-dev] Forget dormant UTXOs without confiscating bitcoin jl2012
2015-12-12 23:01 ` gb
2015-12-13 1:00 ` Vincent Truong
2015-12-13 2:07 ` Gregory Maxwell
2015-12-13 8:13 ` Chris Priest
2015-12-13 8:18 ` Gregory Maxwell [this message]
2015-12-13 9:17 ` Chris Priest
2015-12-13 9:24 ` Gregory Maxwell
2015-12-13 18:11 ` jl2012
2015-12-13 21:20 ` Ricardo Filipe
2015-12-13 21:36 ` Tier Nolan
2015-12-20 11:24 ` Peter Todd
2015-12-20 11:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2015-12-20 11:43 ` s7r
2015-12-20 16:30 ` Chris Pacia
2015-12-20 16:35 ` Peter Todd
2015-12-21 3:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2015-12-21 3:23 ` Tom Harding
2015-12-13 16:14 ` Danny Thorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAS2fgSchJFk1Ejd8ZfMSzxEO-1TWYR6ag-seQNH_QHrc9Cn3w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=greg@xiph.org \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=cp368202@ohiou.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox