From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1XJunX-0008CQ-9u
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 20 Aug 2014 01:34:47 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.220.174 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.220.174; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-vc0-f174.google.com; 
Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1XJunV-0001Km-G5
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 20 Aug 2014 01:34:47 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id la4so8398183vcb.19
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.164.80 with SMTP id yo16mr3731871vdb.44.1408498479932;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.187.132 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140820012623.GN22640@nl.grid.coop>
References: <CAJHLa0NXAYh9HzazN6gArUV8y7J8_G0oqkZqPBgibpW0wRNxKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+s+GJDM4Tq69wDv2UQ07aCLDOayA9C8im+O+cJn2dSrVopUmw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140820012623.GN22640@nl.grid.coop>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:34:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgSdFeC_5Jt9-=aJ2j-S9BHT=QikOWceU8SKVenNoNCiVw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Troy Benjegerdes <hozer@hozed.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1XJunV-0001Km-G5
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsidering github
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 01:34:47 -0000

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Troy Benjegerdes <hozer@hozed.org> wrote:
> If a project cannot be organized enough to run its own hosting/web presense/
> counterintelligence/security that starts with installing an OS and patching
> kernels, then it is really not wise for me to trust my financial future to
> software written by such a group.

Please take the hyperbole elsewhere. Good dialog it's going to happen
with the insults and adhomenem.

Regardless of where the repositories live their integrity is protected
by digital signatures and cryptographic hashes. Running them elsewhere
can be virtuous for other reasons, but it doesn't play much into this
since the same tools must be used to guarantee their security.