From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YVq9H-00005D-DF for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:34:47 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.223.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.223.172; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-ie0-f172.google.com; Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com ([209.85.223.172]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YVq9G-0007vA-Kx for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:34:47 +0000 Received: by ieclw3 with SMTP id lw3so2002674iec.2 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:34:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.31.14 with SMTP id f14mr31478099iof.28.1426116881092; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.6.133 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:34:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55002AD9.2060006@thomaskerin.io> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:34:41 +0000 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Pindar Wong Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1YVq9G-0007vA-Kx Cc: Bitcoin Development Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for standard multi-signature P2SH addresses X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:34:47 -0000 On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Pindar Wong wrote: > Perhaps at some point consider introducing something akin to a > 'Bitcoin-Draft' (BD) status with some autoexpiry period? > > I understand that the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has the > concept of 'Internet Drafts" (ID) and this looks like it has worked for them > so far. Thats more or less what posting to the list is supposed to be. Creating a draft document requires no approval, beyond filling out the right form. Perhaps calling out that as a distinct step would be better, indeed.