From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB78CB5E for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:12:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ua0-f174.google.com (mail-ua0-f174.google.com [209.85.217.174]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51837106 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f174.google.com with SMTP id h2so24581915uaa.1 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:12:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=OvOm25PG1ZRJpdGJgs93cCHV/4JKXpqJGMmO0yJTghA=; b=HFOJcwrBrJMyYcOkSmVmq1cAjZjHHVokJZsgjdjr5y46lArlriEpZXqhIdrjQ1P04K 5ocZFnuYarPOCV44gfH/qnKFj2575wfpNdxypOpwrTAXTcggmp/9aNL5n005LcTxnIO2 b41ixoc52oKaso9slqv2rbcND5zdto3qgMCK0MJc/NDXPlzMyK8SdKsH6blkJjd/3eeI 7VJP8VAP5ZFHGFFqXToREjSSFjuUyebj/ArtugLIRt96z4TU0tNR59AXp+DZIIzBn5Uc /UrNUyS2L8wfU4CNwuUKExTCdjPX9neeIAK3nmCGN4sUAG1GHW2ZzP4ra+5J6Yj7+uvw xKdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OvOm25PG1ZRJpdGJgs93cCHV/4JKXpqJGMmO0yJTghA=; b=rPuEANQIhv0wrarUxEI1DiCnVWBqKYoSEBXhVc+uhn2bR3fUkxdtuo5YJp2TnqiDqF viC81rvDHca6KrMVsJwi0LZwAB1F8FLS7uCrE3Cy9WQugl1PLVingPqNdJGJWbfan+S+ AUFuOgvF6AshlXmQr8ibo5kjxAlYwkVG9qEqAzOqullIpx1lhjDiXFFMN7QAaCvNERh/ 10BhTxFVhJh06HE9Dekx47ixhKQWkSokXqvzLoa0MwM38IqQG5EGbD3AwQFZx6tIosXi XP7+aQQ3cn42KNb99GarZJluQlGRLIUSfszhAwqCxMCZuUTGMDF5ouy+czVLXXWtodqa Qc2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7Svt2GC1yaUKPn3GWtgAWQpw1WDPoFutJMNcIzuiOjBpCXz1rz ueBenVYmvkdQVHyeQ/iMlW+peOgknw== X-Received: by 10.176.9.129 with SMTP id x1mr4044038uag.96.1492204367476; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:12:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.94.132 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:12:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2983024.JOGDlViq2a@cherry> <2003939.Nx7GrYTPuJ@cherry> From: Gregory Maxwell Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:12:47 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1o4pO6vsGX-HDxJnCbdp-S_H7qg Message-ID: To: James Hilliard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] I do not support the BIP 148 UASF X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:12:48 -0000 On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:10 PM, James Hilliard via bitcoin-dev wrote: > would have to intentionally modify the code to mine an invalid block > which is not something that would be likely to happen accidentally. IIRC-- If you do it accidentally you'll fail the tests, though there have been a couple reckless alternative implementations that have just ripped out most of the tests... In any case there is no need to speculate or guess-- invalid segwit spends are not being mined today...