From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA3F8D93 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 18:25:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-it0-f66.google.com (mail-it0-f66.google.com [209.85.214.66]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C4B64DE for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 18:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f66.google.com with SMTP id x28so6776408ita.0 for ; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 10:25:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/q9rnxUy/w5pNre2LpqfxlkLVCvFahfABcoI9EthXzE=; b=FhkBbm8p2mM9Ol39+rRw8aJ7E4dZ+hDFNJh90TCxCRAS2sok4xVTF1ObQpXD10Cl+w to5XQAcKoMLM880/rewVzYGOe7qu0oa84lUCPrNR2lBd60QxN3xIVkEOUKlN2ceXV56o Wyme9FrhZysu35oSuSRql4u6mrXbRbzIV1Bpxeq3uvuLi6rf0YP4CWAAMPEcQhuCWuwR rgwW7n3E03u7YxqBoU9MGZgOpOKU+Z7mT5vTrPvX2fNARSkDdzO8GCHy/yFNurYJpNMU sR4Bdke15m2HuvMD+3cW12iEe+7TxJAAeHNh9uVpol2u9VDO2wMRoQ7/PPqbSUyIy1xE DP0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=/q9rnxUy/w5pNre2LpqfxlkLVCvFahfABcoI9EthXzE=; b=KjVafjBRnHnZ5FS5bFaa0gaduKyPPdjdVeJLrBC3omDBY7zs2Q7MJqbOidKOujYV/n 75dBxnx/C7EkP1Yx7TH/hoKc8oUR6WoHG46zJkAbpuxGgpDd61sMJiZLm3LhTEZU8/oz ifxw6SqOqAKxm09KTnaCuq/SjnmDgTH1qOJqDgzkzuGvwMKibhyeT8+Erjse0ZvT9Jd8 s1i15RrCDwj0dZB+1aNDz6MFcWEhqsLXS01VyEu2k+jG6zNjmX/hV5Zuuj9KX3n5Qqyu S0tULJjGDlUT23XmbDZxTvO26Q4bJlo6JQA80eyuwRL4MUdaJxa2ZJ//8jYNQcZV16lB uxaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mK4eq+eK5t9Pr7FBJyFAeUGbsk9y7kYi6BOA3SNskAXZ9f5Lzaf XWWxo7ldadA4oaj6XgM+9ie7/4+LFTlHHo+qy4tNML9y X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZLYUtdlZL+ctfe+yU6gHYMqPAuSVPvhmB6Cv2GerI/4BaWccvvBGN7V2BfKQiSqJIpTBloCk0/r3MF0Z5O9Bk= X-Received: by 10.107.28.130 with SMTP id c124mr20523660ioc.94.1512757548408; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 10:25:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.8.93 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:25:47 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: DKBryant@gmail.com From: Dan Bryant Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 12:25:47 -0600 Message-ID: To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ff5e44de4d3055fd8506b" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:26:45 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Sign / Verify message against SegWit P2SH addresses. X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:25:50 -0000 --001a113ff5e44de4d3055fd8506b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I know there are posts, and an issue opened against it, but is there anyone writing a BIP for Sign / Verify message against a SegWit address? I realize it is not a feature in wide use, but I think it still serves an important purpose, such as when proof of assets are requested. ref: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10542 --001a113ff5e44de4d3055fd8506b Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I know there are posts, and an issue opened against it, bu= t is there anyone writing a BIP for Sign / Verify message against a SegWit = address?

I realize it is not a feature in wide use, but = I think it still serves an important purpose, such as when proof of assets = are requested.


--001a113ff5e44de4d3055fd8506b--