From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DCAE941 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 22:23:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-it0-f50.google.com (mail-it0-f50.google.com [209.85.214.50]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B04BCA for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 22:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f50.google.com with SMTP id t1so12302691ite.5 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:23:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=D/7LBAF0gHpM1jm0y/8uzbFFRj5zzXKzb7UVY8YJvxQ=; b=MQVKDzNcwzrDL6KG+z+dT6kE+fBMoh2zaOSWAlR6V8W6cyOrDpRXBZtfmRptIaU0lf RCMcCRcMz9aywZVKYMcb7vNpxU9YJpubU0Cf/XCxQ+C0hQjZVG5F8EjfBT7XRwNjOlfM Nq3AGzPD74kvQAaym0x4AYW2gqR/KzmZ+8pfHrRPbz31crPNivxbRGIdDByfkMNLBO3y ZGqrQO6aILRhQ8H4/wNyAjnNX970BiPBcPnByFYbi2SQKCODeAN/40fVa3YJbvcsHO+d UaHHNb+Bgg7fsh1DCNTan8HH8fj6jEnyBnP0tkbc2EgPJd3j2/36SZBcbOX+oyIh+iLx Zmsw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=D/7LBAF0gHpM1jm0y/8uzbFFRj5zzXKzb7UVY8YJvxQ=; b=ZeV0nFHKY5AfsGtCmCUk7QNX755EUPKLyeFdgcpAvJ3k6++flGntfgYhKBO0OvJkzR bsMiWy4+uijhdRxb+qQyJDASEwUQ4RlbRnokzmvduEgNL0XX1fCrYGBpmCxfomocWUJZ DNKqoeCVlnba1wKUZJdc5QBVCBZl56JGxQFhE7sO7zuRO66iu0U2yh8aeYD26mOPhZ/b 1C+2XSQEZmEuCaDpm7B164FgweQ3+BLEYNZ6yCz+Tcn7q5epW2quk73vwb2DFrP35hXi aWCm25+t42gyuvaD3EUkXx+4H1rEXeQV544d9vOPnmKb4xDmJsUsy5eulOqDatOVUwjn CALQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIAiFU2MPyhTGhwIg040U/KBp7MIsQ8d1bUiZHn9Apsu04PewwI bvcYOMCdFW0VACNeFedGFx/Jybq0bUW7/DMtwrAq8Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBoty5WqEdbqLiwu0VfW/L3mqXm+wyYOgvmA39N5mjiN5mIdEoMnWPgar2MSLFHZI5LDsMkz4oqwSwTKsJgulMvo= X-Received: by 10.36.151.141 with SMTP id k135mr14548645ite.15.1513894979398; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:22:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.31.141 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:22:58 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: DKBryant@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <52b65bab-ff84-7e21-e35a-f6ebd8106767@satoshilabs.com> References: <52b65bab-ff84-7e21-e35a-f6ebd8106767@satoshilabs.com> From: Dan Bryant Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 16:22:58 -0600 Message-ID: To: Pavol Rusnak Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0d00d07972790560e1245b" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 22:30:54 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Sign / Verify message against SegWit P2SH addresses. X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 22:23:00 -0000 --94eb2c0d00d07972790560e1245b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" legacy message sign verify BIP to get the ball rolling. early draft: https://github.com/brianddk/bips/blob/legacysignverify/bip-0xyz.mediawiki On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Pavol Rusnak wrote: > On 08/12/17 19:25, Dan Bryant via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > I know there are posts, and an issue opened against it, but is there > > anyone writing a BIP for Sign / Verify message against a SegWit address? > > Dan, are you still planning to write this BIP? > > -- > Best Regards / S pozdravom, > > Pavol "stick" Rusnak > CTO, SatoshiLabs > --94eb2c0d00d07972790560e1245b Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
legacy message sign verify BIP to get the ball rolling.=C2= =A0=C2=A0


On Tue, Dec 19, 2017= at 3:36 PM, Pavol Rusnak <stick@satoshilabs.com> wrote:=
On 08/12/17 19:25, Dan = Bryant via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I know there are posts, and an issue opened against it, but is there > anyone writing a BIP for Sign / Verify message against a SegWit addres= s?

Dan, are you still planning to write this BIP?

--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol "stick" Rusnak
CTO, SatoshiLabs

--94eb2c0d00d07972790560e1245b--