From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C89CABA for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 07:19:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B61E8ED for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 07:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igoe12 with SMTP id e12so8009440igo.1 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 00:19:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2S4R4TD6bCorPtjmuhuVy5s1x1z1qPupFNFIjeNS9Jg=; b=I9s3jwjKEsKHxg+Rfgsa7whXXGffRzBxpWhHsVgKwTdTvIKaKnXy387apMEDMhlHcg 5eTL/Q8wd4nIeEVVTO1bdUTOY1wqB3tptuFRZC4QzKa411IDTOSJ/yj63QZeQNgMtKHj wJWbQ16W6s/FI++l87sT1tqo0VoIQ968prTY3JM2+MhJx7Mfsb6UxsKDnJZXXgBUiNgB Py1JU5gPy9nsvCdJy7xK66fV/Od7WMnkEdvgDNon8kxjdGaMm9ylJIimXSeEc4+4Gwt/ oxY3FdBvvfl+n0ChZqAWatm3qbxQDw4hClCV1PAvpOWqcNIggriSt3Xj8a8wgr5jULrR fxtA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.93.69 with SMTP id cs5mr98594428igb.4.1436426346094; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 00:19:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.17.229 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 00:19:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201507090622.43214.luke@dashjr.org> References: <201507060424.57070.luke@dashjr.org> <201507090622.43214.luke@dashjr.org> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 02:19:06 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dan Bryant To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] REQ BIP # / Discuss - Sweep incoming unconfirmed transactions with a bounty. X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: DKBryant@gmail.com List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 07:19:07 -0000 FYI, looks like someone was trying to boost up a transaction tonight and managed to get it pushed through. parent: 4cc3e2b6407ae8cdc1fd62cb3235f9c92654277684da8970db19a0169e44c68c child: 161b302d1af8b6eacf1140726b26c67fa72ecf4f7f7e6cd8d83ef492b8b490ea gchld: 4f6821b50c046ae40d488aa18d88d41c9d0686daedf835b68b8c5086b73939fd ggch: 0c159d19f6452f12512a4ec16868a3af00fe381a0913f4fc69b3fc14c4588aa9 gggch: 4e4f96c5ba416961be347ffc496e8ce12046191ab7fb252e88966ce365d2bc5f though it's position in the block doesn't seem to be a priority / fee cut line.