From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2175A103E for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 19:00:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-yk0-f181.google.com (mail-yk0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7458C3CA for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 19:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ykdt18 with SMTP id t18so10191486ykd.3 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:00:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TMb0EavAGKdCXgOOQOm5ZQFi5rGu3byh1+Gyj6jlnqs=; b=QV/lQnMWd4jjaroihYtYNtWfXNn4eOjrr4s2DasB8/Fi+ugx3fJSGLhyA3dyiit3J0 b1xatun0ZYnzE+Krbk61uC8W8AkOReQUXRBpRbTTSs6vT7CQLDk1b0CIs6I3R5PrizB1 XtA0xaAMqCsNF2CzarfyTZFa0XPt3EN8YF2oW1svJmDH891TwmeFf/bBJzkzQEnsZXDN VvIvXJu5U91QXXLXeQohJBRy+YVOOJR8wKZGBoTVvdB247nhbwO2pTB01G24oqTGPvn0 BPJF1gdaJyC6h2zl3mifd0JoQrRsYZrmwxt6APHLWwaD1FrSOx+okS3NEUskVvhOZHQX Zqqg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmClzZ2FTjGTTHGJlgbmJjh6ppY7cBn7+RqYLmOWoyDTgIe206LL8felNIewQOlglFisXJx MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.10.215 with SMTP id 206mr38293990ywk.120.1441825255705; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:00:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.13.205.6 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:00:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 21:00:55 +0200 Message-ID: From: Marcel Jamin To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142d292320800051f551a3c X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Yet another blocklimit proposal / compromise X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 19:00:57 -0000 --001a1142d292320800051f551a3c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think the overlap of people who want to run a serious mining operation and people who are unable to afford a slightly above average internet connection is infinitesimally small. 2015-09-09 20:51 GMT+02:00 Jorge Tim=C3=B3n : > > On Sep 9, 2015 8:36 PM, "Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev" < > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > I propose to: > > > > a) assess what blocklimit is currently technically possible without > driving up costs of running a node up too much. Most systems currently > running a fullnode probably have some capacity left. > > What about the risk of further increasing mining centralization? > --001a1142d292320800051f551a3c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think the overlap of people who want to run a serious mi= ning operation and people who are unable to afford a slightly above average= internet connection is infinitesimally small.
2015-09-09 20:51 GMT+02:00 Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <j= timon@jtimon.cc>:


On Sep 9, 2015 8:36 PM, "Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoi= n-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> I propose to:
>
> a) assess what blocklimit is currently technically possible without dr= iving up costs of running a node up too much. Most systems currently runnin= g a fullnode probably have some capacity left.

What about the risk of further increasing mining centralizat= ion?


--001a1142d292320800051f551a3c--