public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Priest <cp368202@ohiou.edu>
To: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>,
	 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
	<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Classic 1.2.0 released
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 17:58:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAcC9ysOn0CkEO53NnQPnvVJ-PzCmrHYRqYcdZBqBfDbYnv5Vw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABr1YTfRDUQNivebMvsONV0na7j_sEyw3gii+5r4v8txu+O68w@mail.gmail.com>

Its too bad you're not the one who decides what gets posted here or
not. If you don't like whats being discussed, then don't open those
emails.

On 1/7/17, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Can you guys please take this discussion elsewhere? Perhaps to
> bitcoin-discuss? This is not the place to rehash discussions that have
> taken place a million times already. The behavior of the network under
> contentious hard forks has been discussed ad nauseum. This mailing list is
> for the discussion of new ideas and proposals.
>
> Much appreciated. Thanks.
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> On 01/07/2017 03:10 PM, Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> > Still wondering why you guys don't care about the ridiculous number of
>> > full nodes, no incentive to run one and what would happen if someone
>> > were to control a majority of full nodes
>>
>> The level of control over a majority of full nodes is irrelevant. If
>> this was truly a measure of control over Bitcoin someone would simply
>> spin up a bunch of nodes and take control at trivial cost.
>>
>> e
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-08  1:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-06 10:16 [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Classic 1.2.0 released Tom Zander
2017-01-07  8:13 ` Jonas Schnelli
2017-01-07  8:55 ` Eric Lombrozo
2017-01-07 15:15   ` Tom Zander
2017-01-07 20:12   ` Chris Priest
2017-01-07 20:17     ` David Vorick
2017-01-07 20:26       ` Chris Priest
2017-01-07 21:14         ` Eric Voskuil
2017-01-07 23:10         ` Aymeric Vitte
2017-01-07 23:49           ` Eric Voskuil
2017-01-08  0:28             ` Eric Lombrozo
2017-01-08  1:58               ` Chris Priest [this message]
2017-01-07 21:15     ` Btc Drak
2017-01-07 23:08       ` Tom Zander
2017-01-08  0:32   ` Eric Voskuil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAcC9ysOn0CkEO53NnQPnvVJ-PzCmrHYRqYcdZBqBfDbYnv5Vw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=cp368202@ohiou.edu \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=elombrozo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox