From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D4FCB55 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 22:40:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qk0-f169.google.com (mail-qk0-f169.google.com [209.85.220.169]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C713296 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 22:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id g67so587552qkd.0 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:40:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=2hK2ZFoEwQKIRDohNeweR2BCaWhXT1zaIk2gCTjhLuQ=; b=KPxJ/IPpoCHuQA+wwSeSvSJW9ZOnzcrtEaPZowI6fGXSsuZl6ORPRnrYADLLc2n9nA kMNPIWMIzpyGl6MnnOVeheIdhEZ7UQ4ffV13Y78TgqIJRuc6Cqmq0X3dzydx/JK8aCZS 6NrcFxA3+YnnwJJQHjOKSCdVHgkvHZbxVYPDh4RAC/Twb/ov6ZIyVIAeTRWMCkbTp9Ms JrYgWW5QST4gWsgvg7aYpEHMaGvLNeAIOWxFjrLsMngr9TEN+nXLvtToNw+FGzZpnEaJ 3L1Sp1hbXko9UmM3Tb1CVclXMnSf5+c1xpljAcw1yjIHUSDhS8lPKXJu3my0Qj86tpvp 1cKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2hK2ZFoEwQKIRDohNeweR2BCaWhXT1zaIk2gCTjhLuQ=; b=STIpuz5dRHusNUD11k8PeFJF1pjksl+Xu7xIkvFhEElFpaXdxjUG4ib54hELrZLfkM z0lDomS5waLWh5ubMljFnUx8Y9Q4/WyVsYb1fhrqAP+dw/wZ4TXXdFydz55hiVvk880B nUSIijBYHC3igHQ801SZsmQZGWnY2Q11izUURyZTw2I7UMTTu5X06S/lf5Q8dywdwMVz HOYNY1JOvoj/DYM+T6pRWNU8eH0QtKexJPpe3EST+1T6tphk8246+1jKVNFjERhIwmxC Xeyzh900v95TAsaDL5wOyqUKJxbiQNauD6eZ2OTE+BUgUw+vATVEC7tUSKM05QR64iji rLGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOIy6Tfczdd9OttMhMQZ3kOQ5ZNFykGzGM+oy0ykNyiSw86Nc9cyF2UpPv7jSEru9ziYrFVWz+dOfsXQQ== X-Received: by 10.55.204.28 with SMTP id r28mr43226435qki.219.1474497658421; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:40:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nbvfour@gmail.com Received: by 10.237.55.199 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:40:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <358752cc-48f6-eef8-ae9a-e17a0651ed52@murch.one> From: Chris Priest Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:40:57 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: UBgwn8jDwQHsxdzPup9Rowh9s-I Message-ID: To: Andreas Schildbach , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] On-going work: Coin Selection Simulation X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 22:40:59 -0000 >From my experience working with coin selection algorithms, there are three "goals" to it: 1. Minimize cost 2. Maximize privacy 3. Minimize UTXO footprint You can build a coin selection algorithm that achieves 1 and 3, but will sacrifice 2. If you want coin selectin to maximize your privacy, it will happen at the expense of UTXO footprint and fees. Minimizing cost usually also minimizes UTXO footprint but not always. To completely minimize UTXO footprint, you sacrifice a bit on cost, and a lot on privacy. On 9/21/16, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev wrote: > On 09/21/2016 02:58 PM, Murch via bitcoin-dev wrote: > >> Android Wallet for Bitcoin > > The correct name is Bitcoin Wallet, or Bitcoin Wallet for Android (if > you want to refer to the Android version). > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >